REHABILITATING CRIMINAL JUSTICE POLICY AND PRACTICE

被引:719
作者
Andrews, D. A. [2 ]
Bonta, James [1 ]
机构
[1] Publ Safety Canada, Correct Res, Ottawa, ON K1A 0P8, Canada
[2] Carleton Univ, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
关键词
deterrence; offender rehabilitation; offender risk; criminogenic needs; CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT; RISK-ASSESSMENT; METAANALYSIS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; RECIDIVISM; OFFENDERS; CRIME; CLASSIFICATION; PREDICTION; WORKS;
D O I
10.1037/a0018362
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
For over 30 years, criminal justice policy has been dominated by a "get tough" approach to offenders. Increasing punitive measures have failed to reduce criminal recidivism and instead have led to a rapidly growing correctional system that has strained government budgets. The inability of reliance on official punishment to deter crime is understandable within the context of the psychology of human conduct, However, this knowledge was largely ignored in the quest for harsher punishment. A better option for dealing with crime is to place greater effort on the rehabilitation of offenders. In particular, programs that adhere to the Risk-NeedResponsivity (RNR) model have been shown to reduce offender recidivism by up to 35%. The model describes: a) who should receive services (moderate and higher risk cases), b) the appropriate targets for rehabilitation services (criminogenic needs), and c) the powerful influence strategies for reducing criminal behavior (cognitive social learning). Although the RNR model is well known in the correctional field it is less well known, but equally relevant, for forensic, clinical, and counseling psychology. The paper summarizes the empirical base to RNR along with implications for research, policy, and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 55
页数:17
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project:: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction [J].
AEgisdottir, S ;
White, MJ ;
Spengler, PM ;
Maugherman, AS ;
Anderson, LA ;
Cook, RS ;
Nichols, CN ;
Lampropoulos, GK ;
Walker, BS ;
Cohen, G ;
Rush, JD .
COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 34 (03) :341-382
[2]   Where oh where are the specific ingredients? A meta-analysis of component studies in counseling and psychotherapy [J].
Ahn, HN ;
Wampold, BE .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 48 (03) :251-257
[3]  
Andrews D., 2001, CORRECTIONS CANADA S, P170
[4]   The risk-need-responsivity model of assessment and human service in prevention and corrections: Crime-prevention jurisprudence [J].
Andrews, D. A. ;
Dowden, Craig .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2007, 49 (04) :439-464
[5]   Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment - A meta-analytic investigation [J].
Andrews, D. A. ;
Dowden, Craig .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2006, 50 (01) :88-100
[6]  
Andrews D.A., 2006, PSYCHOL CRIMINAL CON, V4th
[7]  
Andrews D.A., 1994, PSYCHOL CRIMINAL CON
[8]  
Andrews D.A., 2006, CRIMINOL PUBLIC POL, V5, P595, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00394.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1745-9133.2006.00394.X]
[9]   CLASSIFICATION FOR EFFECTIVE REHABILITATION - REDISCOVERING PSYCHOLOGY [J].
ANDREWS, DA ;
BONTA, J ;
HOGE, RD .
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 1990, 17 (01) :19-52
[10]   The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment [J].
Andrews, DA ;
Bonta, J ;
Wormith, JS .
CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 2006, 52 (01) :7-27