Accurate Nonendoscopic Detection of Barrett's Esophagus by Methylated DNA Markers: A Multisite Case Control Study

被引:27
作者
Iyer, Prasad G. [1 ]
Taylor, William R. [1 ]
Johnson, Michele L. [1 ]
Lansing, Ramona L. [1 ]
Maixner, Kristyn A. [1 ]
Hemminger, Lois L. [2 ]
Cayer, Frances K. [2 ]
Yab, Tracy C. [1 ]
Devens, Mary E. [1 ]
Slettedahl, Seth W. [3 ]
Broderick, Brendan T. [3 ]
Mahoney, Douglas W. [3 ]
McGlinch, Maria C. [1 ]
Berger, Calise K. [1 ]
Foote, Patrick H. [1 ]
Giakomopoulos, Maria [4 ]
Allawi, Hatim [4 ]
Smyrk, Thomas C. [5 ]
Wang, Kenneth K. [1 ]
Katzka, David A. [1 ]
Wolfsen, Herbert C. [2 ]
Burke, James A. [6 ]
Ahlquist, David A. [1 ]
Kisiel, John B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Jacksonville, FL USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Exact Sci, Madison, WI USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Anat Pathol, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Mayo Clin Hlth Syst, Div Family Med, Austin, MN USA
关键词
RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; DYSPLASIA;
D O I
10.14309/ajg.0000000000000656
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Nonendoscopic Barrett's esophagus (BE) screening may help improve esophageal adenocarcinoma outcomes. We previously demonstrated promising accuracy of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) for the nonendoscopic diagnosis ofBE using samples obtained from a capsule sponge-on-string (SOS) device. We aimed to assess the accuracy of these MDMs in an independent cohort using a commercial grade assay. METHODS: BE cases had >= 1 cm of circumferential BE with intestinal metaplasia; controls had no endoscopic evidence of BE. The SOS device was withdrawn 8 minutes after swallowing, followed by endoscopy (the criterion standard). Highest performing MDMs from a previous study were blindly assessed on extracted bisulfite-converted DNA by target enrichment long-probe quantitative amplified signal (TELQAS) assays. Optimal MDM combinations were selected and analyzed using random forest modeling with in silico cross-validation. RESULTS: Of 295 patients consented, 268 (91%) swallowed the SOSdevice; 112 cases and 89 controlsmet the preestablished inclusion criteria. Themedian BE length was 6 cm (interquartile range 4-9), and 50% had no dysplasia. The cross-validated sensitivity and specificity of a 5MDMrandomforestmodelwere 92%(95% confidence interval 85%-96%) and 94% (95% confidence interval 87%-98%), respectively. Model performance was not affected by age, gender, or smoking history but was influenced by the BE segment length. SOS administrationwas well tolerated (median [interquartile range] tolerability 2 [0, 4] on10 scale grading), and 95% preferred SOS over endoscopy. DISCUSSION: Using a minimally invasive molecular approach, MDMs assayed from SOS samples show promise as a safe and accurate nonendoscopic test for BE prediction.
引用
收藏
页码:1201 / 1209
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Ultrathin esophagoscopy in screening for Barrett's esophagus at a veterans administration hospital: Easy access does not lead to referrals [J].
Atkinson, Matt ;
Das, Ananya ;
Faulx, Ashley ;
Kinnard, Margaret ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Chak, Amitabh .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 (01) :92-97
[2]  
Breiman L., 2001, IEEE Trans. Broadcast., V45, P5
[3]   Random forest versus logistic regression: a large-scale benchmark experiment [J].
Couronne, Raphael ;
Probst, Philipp ;
Boulesteix, Anne-Laure .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2018, 19
[4]   British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus [J].
Fitzgerald, Rebecca C. ;
di Pietro, Massimiliano ;
Ragunath, Krish ;
Ang, Yeng ;
Kang, Jin-Yong ;
Watson, Peter ;
Trudgill, Nigel ;
Patel, Praful ;
Kaye, Philip V. ;
Sanders, Scott ;
O'Donovan, Maria ;
Bird-Lieberman, Elizabeth ;
Bhandari, Pradeep ;
Jankowski, Janusz A. ;
Attwood, Stephen ;
Parsons, Simon L. ;
Loft, Duncan ;
Lagergren, Jesper ;
Moayyedi, Paul ;
Lyratzopoulos, Georgios ;
de Caestecker, John .
GUT, 2014, 63 (01) :7-42
[5]   Barrett's esophagus is frequently overdiagnosed in clinical practice: results of the Barrett's Esophagus Endoscopic Revision (BEER) study [J].
Ganz, Robert A. ;
Allen, John I. ;
Leon, Sam ;
Batts, Kenneth P. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 79 (04) :565-573
[6]   Variable selection using random forests [J].
Genuer, Robin ;
Poggi, Jean-Michel ;
Tuleau-Malot, Christine .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2010, 31 (14) :2225-2236
[7]   Detection of Barrett's esophagus after endoscopic healing of erosive esophagitis [J].
Hanna, Sameh ;
Rastogi, Amit ;
Weston, Allan P. ;
Totta, Frank ;
Schmitz, Robert ;
Mathur, Sharad ;
McGregor, Douglas ;
Cherian, Rachel ;
Sharma, Prateek .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (07) :1416-1420
[8]   Trends in esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence and mortality [J].
Hur, Chin ;
Miller, Melecia ;
Kong, Chung Yin ;
Dowling, Emily C. ;
Nattinger, Kevin J. ;
Dunn, Michelle ;
Feuer, Eric J. .
CANCER, 2013, 119 (06) :1149-1158
[9]  
Imperiale TF, 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, V370, P1287, DOI [10.1056/NEJMoa1311194, 10.1056/NEJMc1405215]
[10]   Highly Discriminant Methylated DNA Markers for the Non-endoscopic Detection of Barrett's Esophagus [J].
Iyer, Prasad G. ;
Taylor, William R. ;
Johnson, Michele L. ;
Lansing, Ramona L. ;
Maixner, Kristyn A. ;
Yab, Tracy C. ;
Simonson, Julie A. ;
Devens, Mary E. ;
Slettedahl, Seth W. ;
Mahoney, Douglas W. ;
Berger, Calise K. ;
Foote, Patrick H. ;
Smyrk, Thomas C. ;
Wang, Kenneth K. ;
Wolfsen, Herbert C. ;
Ahlquist, David A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 (08) :1156-1166