The PCOC Symptom Assessment Scale (SAS): A valid measure for daily use at point of care and in palliative care programs

被引:33
作者
Daveson, Barbara A. [1 ]
Allingham, Samuel Frederic [1 ]
Clapham, Sabina [1 ]
Johnson, Claire E. [2 ]
Currow, David C. [3 ]
Yates, Patsy [4 ]
Eagar, Kathy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Australian Hlth Serv Res Inst, Palliat Care Outcomes Collaborat, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Monash Nursing & Midwifery, Eastern Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Hlth, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Nursing, Ctr Palliat Care Res & Educ, Queensland Hlth, Kelvin Grove, Qld, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0247250
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Very few measures are used successfully as part of routine care within national palliative care outcome programs. Only a handful of studies examine these measures. The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity of a measure used in a national outcomes program: the Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration Symptom Assessment Scale (PCOC SAS). Methods A retrospective multi-site cohort study with secondary analysis of routinely collected patient-level data to assess PCOC SAS's internal consistency, construct validity, reliability, interpretability, acceptability and sensitivity. The analyses used two sets, with data collected by inpatient and community palliative care services registered with the Australian national PCOC. Results Dataset one included 1,117 patients receiving palliative care from 21 services. Dataset two included 5,294 patients receiving palliative care from 119 PCOC services. PCOC SAS demonstrated the ability to detect and discriminate distress by palliative care phase, functional status and diagnosis. Excellent and good convergent and discriminant validity were demonstrated. Fair through to substantial inter-rater and intra-rater reliability levels were evidenced. Sufficient interpretability resulted along with necessary levels of acceptability and sensitivity. Conclusion PCOC SAS is a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measure suitable for use in routine clinical care with patients requiring palliative and or end-of-life care, including in national outcomes programs.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Abernethy Amy P, 2005, BMC Palliat Care, V4, P7
[2]   Measuring Symptom Distress in Palliative Care: Psychometric Properties of the Symptom Assessment Scale (SAS) [J].
Aoun, Samar M. ;
Monterosso, Leanne ;
Kristjanson, Linda J. ;
McConigley, Ruth .
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 14 (03) :315-321
[3]  
Clapham S., 2018, PALLIATIVE CARE OUTC
[4]  
Clapham S., 2020, IS PATIENT SELF REPO
[5]   Improving national hospice/palliative care service symptom outcomes systematically through point-of-care data collection, structured feedback and benchmarking [J].
Currow, David C. ;
Allingham, Samuel ;
Yates, Patsy ;
Johnson, Claire ;
Clark, Katherine ;
Eagar, Kathy .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2015, 23 (02) :307-315
[6]   An Australian casemix classification for palliative care: technical development and results [J].
Eagar, K ;
Green, J ;
Gordon, R .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 18 (03) :217-226
[7]  
Fayers PM., 2007, QUALITY LIFE ASSESSM, V2nd, P77
[8]   Changes in physical functioning and quality of life in patients with cancer - Response shift and relative evaluation of one's condition [J].
Hagedoorn, M ;
Sneeuw, KCA ;
Aaronson, NK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 55 (02) :176-183
[9]  
Kincaid JP., 1975, RES BRANCH REPORT 8
[10]  
Kristjanson L., 1999, Development and Testing of the Revised Symptom Assessment Scale (SAS): Final Report