Portfolio problems with two levels decision-makers: Optimal portfolio selection with pricing decisions on transaction costs

被引:13
|
作者
Leal, Marina [1 ,2 ]
Ponce, Diego [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Puerto, Justo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IMUS, Seville, Spain
[2] Univ Seville, Fac Math, Dept Stat & Operat Res, Seville, Spain
[3] Concordia Univ, Fac Engn & Comp Sci, CIRRELT, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Concordia Univ, Fac Engn & Comp Sci, Dept Mech Ind & Aerosp Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Finance; Portfolio optimization; Bilevel optimization; Transaction costs; Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR); OPTIMIZATION; MODELS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2019.12.039
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper presents novel bilevel leader-follower portfolio selection problems in which the financial intermediary becomes a decision-maker. This financial intermediary decides on the unit transaction costs for investing in some securities, maximizing its benefits, and the investor chooses his optimal portfolio, minimizing risk and ensuring a given expected return. Hence, transaction costs become decision variables in the portfolio problem, and two levels of decision-makers are incorporated: the financial intermediary and the investor. These situations give rise to general Nonlinear Programming formulations in both levels of the decision process. We present different bilevel versions of the problem: financial intermediary-leader, investor-leader, and social welfare; besides, their properties are analyzed. Moreover, we develop Mixed Integer Linear Programming formulations for some of the proposed problems and effective algorithms for some others. Finally, we report on some computational experiments performed on data taken from the Dow Jones Industrial Average, and analyze and compare the results obtained by the different models. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:712 / 727
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The dual optimizer for the growth-optimal portfolio under transaction costs
    S. Gerhold
    J. Muhle-Karbe
    W. Schachermayer
    Finance and Stochastics, 2013, 17 : 325 - 354
  • [42] The admissible portfolio selection problem with transaction costs and an improved PSO algorithm
    Chen, Wei
    Zhang, Wei-Guo
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2010, 389 (10) : 2070 - 2076
  • [43] On-line portfolio selection strategy with prediction in the presence of transaction costs
    Sergio Albeverio
    LanJun Lao
    XueLei Zhao
    Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 2001, 54 : 133 - 161
  • [44] A hybrid FA–SA algorithm for fuzzy portfolio selection with transaction costs
    Wei Chen
    Yun Wang
    Mukesh Kumar Mehlawat
    Annals of Operations Research, 2018, 269 : 129 - 147
  • [45] Portfolio Selection Models Considering Fuzzy Preference Relations of Decision Makers
    Guo, Weiwei
    Zhang, Wei-Guo
    Chen, Xiaoqing
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2024, 54 (04): : 2254 - 2265
  • [46] On asset pricing in a binomial model with fixed and proportional transaction costs, portfolio constraints and dividends
    Babaei, Esmaeil
    MATHEMATICAL METHODS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2025, 101 (01) : 29 - 50
  • [47] Possibilistic Approaches to Portfolio Selection Problem with General Transaction Costs and a CLPSO Algorithm
    Zhang, Xi-li
    Zhang, Wei-Guo
    Xu, Wei-jun
    Xiao, Wei-Lin
    COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 36 (03) : 191 - 200
  • [48] Long-and Short-Term Forecasting for Portfolio Selection with Transaction Costs
    Uziel, Guy
    El-Yaniv, Ran
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND STATISTICS, VOL 108, 2020, 108
  • [49] A hybrid FA-SA algorithm for fuzzy portfolio selection with transaction costs
    Chen, Wei
    Wang, Yun
    Mehlawat, Mukesh Kumar
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2018, 269 (1-2) : 129 - 147
  • [50] A new optimal portfolio selection strategy based on a quadratic form mean-variance model with transaction costs
    Peng, Hui
    Kitagawa, Genshiro
    Gan, Min
    Chen, Xiaohong
    OPTIMAL CONTROL APPLICATIONS & METHODS, 2011, 32 (02): : 127 - 138