IMPACT OF DIFFERENT ACTIVE METHODOLOGIES ON THE LEARNING OF STUDENTS IN ENGINEERING

被引:0
作者
Sergio Artal, J. [1 ]
Manuel Artacho, J. [2 ]
Romero Pascual, E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Elect Engn, Zaragoza, Spain
[2] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Elect & Commun, Zaragoza, Spain
[3] Univ Zaragoza, Univ Sch Engn & Architecture, Dept Chem Engn & Environm Technol, EINA, Zaragoza, Spain
来源
INTED2016: 10TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE | 2016年
关键词
Problem based Learning; Project based Learning; Challenge Problem; Experience based Learning; Case Method; Learning by-doing; e-portfolio; active-collaborative strategies; Hands-on Laboratory; Blended learning; Autonomous learning; Educational effectiveness; e-Learning; Motivation; Higher Education; Educational Innovation; Social Media in Education; HIGHER-EDUCATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Active-collaborative experience shown herein was performed in the Industrial Electronics subject; being a subject matter that has no class attendance to be within the curriculum extinction of ancient engineering. Although the considerations and conclusions are perfectly extrapolated to other matters, subjects and knowledge disciplines. The implemented model has as background, tests and experiments performed in previous academic years. The purpose of these methodologies is that the student plays an active role, promoting the compressive learning and the knowledge application. Now the effort of the students, during the development of the different experiences, is more oriented towards the acquisition of skills and abilities than towards the simple memorization of contents and concepts. This reality that the teachers perceive every day has transformed the way in which students interact with their environment; thus a change has occurred in the nature of higher education. The model focuses on student learning encouraging their activity and involvement. Thus the teacher's role changes from the simple knowledge transmission to students on the blackboard, to suggest multiple activities to be the mediator in the knowledge construction. Numerous authors indicate that the incorporation of active and collaborative methodologies in the classroom such as: Problem-based Learning, e-Portfolio, Challenge Problem, Learning by-doing, Case Method, m-Learning, Blended-Learning, Simulation-based Learning., (the list can be endless), allow the student to achieve a more significant learning; while at the same time it assumes responsibility for their own learning. Applications focused in learning by-doing allow to speed-up the learning process; this facilitates the design and implementation of active strategies in the classroom. Learning by-doing is a very effective idea for students to acquire knowledge, if they are well motivated. This paper shows the results of the impact that has on the teaching, the implementation of different learning strategies used in the subject along the academic course. The incorporation of this set of active tools, has allowed to establish a culture and behaviour towards the continuous improvement of students, increasing their abilities, competencies and skills. Undoubtedly its use improves the motivation and increase interest and involvement of students in the matter. As educational objectives were considered: use new applications and mechanisms for the continuous supervision of the students; revitalize the follow-up of the subject; structure the different tasks (attendance/on-line/virtual) of the students; motivate and encourage the student to work continuously in the subject throughout the academic year. Educational innovation strategies shown in this paper are economically efficient, sustainable and transferable to other subjects and knowledge disciplines, because the resources and tools necessary for its implementation are free and widely used within the educational community. The purpose is simply to reflect and draw conclusions about which of these techniques have higher acceptance by the students; at the same time it is possible to compare the benefits of the methods used and the effectiveness of each of the educational strategies. In addition the results of the various questionnaires performed on students are presented in order to know their views and impressions concerning the development and implementation of several educational activities.
引用
收藏
页码:3611 / 3620
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Artal J.S., 2015, 9 INT TECHN ED DEV C, P7881
[2]  
Artal J. S., 2015, 9 INT TECHN ED DEV C, P7871
[3]  
Artal J.S., 2015, 7 INT C ED NEW LEARN, P8194
[4]   New Horizons on Education Inspired by Information and communication technologies [J].
Bouarab-Dahmani, Farida ;
Tahi, Razika .
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEW HORIZONS IN EDUCATION, INTE 2014, 2015, 174 :602-608
[5]  
Bowman RJ, 2013, MIDWEST SYMP CIRCUIT, P574, DOI 10.1109/MWSCAS.2013.6674713
[6]   Using e-portfolios to facilitate university students' knowledge management performance: E-portfolio vs. non-portfolio [J].
Chang, Chi-Cheng ;
Tseng, Kuo-Hung ;
Liang, Chaoyun ;
Chen, To-Yu .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2013, 69 :216-224
[7]   Constructing reality: A study of remote, hands-on, and simulated laboratories [J].
Corter, James E. ;
Nickerson, Jeffrey V. ;
Esche, Sven K. ;
Chassapis, Constantin ;
Im, Seongah ;
Ma, Jing .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER-HUMAN INTERACTION, 2007, 14 (02)
[8]   Between theory and practice: the importance of ICT in Higher Education as a tool for collaborative learning [J].
Duta, Nicoleta ;
Martinez-Rivera, Oscar .
6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE EDU WORLD 2014: EDUCATION FACING CONTEMPORARY WORLD ISSUES, 2015, 180 :1466-1473
[9]   Mobile Technologies Education [J].
Fojtik, Rostislav .
3RD CYPRUS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (CY-ICER 2014), 2014, 143 :342-346
[10]  
Heywood J., 2005, LEARNING STRATEGIES, P119