Facilitating fourth-grade students? written argumentation: The use of an argumentation graphic organizer

被引:4
|
作者
Wei, Liwei [1 ]
Firetto, Carla M. [2 ]
Murphy, P. Karen [1 ]
Li, Mengyi [3 ]
Greene, Jeffrey A. [4 ]
Croninger, Rachel M. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ USA
[3] Amer Inst Res, Washington, DC USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
关键词
Written argumentation; graphic organizer; quality talk graphic organizer; fourth-grade students; MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS; COUNTERARGUMENT INTEGRATION; READING-COMPREHENSION; LEARNING-DISABILITIES; WRITING SKILLS; INSTRUCTION; STRATEGIES; LD;
D O I
10.1080/00220671.2019.1654428
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Literacy instruction in the 21st century must bolster students? ability to critically process text and craft well-reasoned written argumentation. The authors investigated changes in fourth-grade students? (N?=?28; 15 girls) written argumentation as they used a researcher-developed graphic organizer (i.e., Quality Talk graphic organizer [QT(GO)]). The authors also examined the extent to which students? graphic organizer performance predicted their written argumentation and whether such prediction was sustained across genres. Both QT(GO) responses and written argumentation essays were scored for quantity and quality. Multilevel modeling analyses reveal that (a) both quantity and quality of students? written argumentation essays statistically significantly improved after students used QT(GO) and (b) students? graphic organizer performance seemed to attenuate the effect of genre on their written argumentation for both quantity and quality. Results suggest that QT(GO) facilitated students? written argumentation, making it easier for fourth-grade students to write about both narrative and expository texts.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 639
页数:13
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据