Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidies with cell-free DNA in the general pregnancy population: a cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:42
作者
Fairbrother, Genevieve [1 ]
Burigo, John [2 ]
Sharon, Thomas [1 ]
Song, Ken [3 ]
机构
[1] Obstet & Gynecol Atlanta, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Ob Gyn Specialists Palm Beaches PA, Palm Beach Gardens, FL USA
[3] Ariosa Diagnost Inc, 5945 Opt Court, San Jose, CA 95138 USA
关键词
Cell-free DNA; cost-effectiveness; Down syndrome; non-invasive prenatal testing; prenatal screening; DOWN-SYNDROME; NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY; MATERNAL AGE; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2015.1038703
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of fetal aneuploidy screening in the general pregnancy population using non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as compared to first trimester combined screening (FTS) with serum markers and NT ultrasound. Methods: Using a decision-analytic model, we estimated the number of fetal T21, T18, and T13 cases identified prenatally, the number of invasive procedures performed, corresponding normal fetus losses, and costs of screening using FTS or NIPT with cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Modeling was based on a 4 million pregnant women cohort, which represents annual births in the U.S. Results: For the general pregnancy population, NIPT identified 15% more trisomy cases, reduced invasive procedures by 88%, and reduced iatrogenic fetal loss by 94% as compared to FTS. The cost per trisomy case identified with FTS was $497909. At a NIPT unit, cost of $453 and below, there were cost savings as compared to FTS. Accounting for additional trisomy cases identified by NIPT, a NIPT unit cost of $665 provided the same per trisomy cost as that of FTS. Conclusions: NIPT in the general pregnancy population leads to more prenatal identification of fetal trisomy cases as compared to FTS and is more economical at a NIPT unit cost of $453.
引用
收藏
页码:1160 / 1164
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins, 2007, Obstet Gynecol, V109, P217
  • [2] Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Fetal Aneuploidy
    不详
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 120 (06) : 1532 - 1534
  • [3] Chorionic villus sampling compared with amniocentesis and the difference in the rate of pregnancy loss
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Hopkins, Linda M.
    Norton, Mary E.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (03) : 612 - 616
  • [4] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1995, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V44, P694
  • [5] Maternal cfDNA screening for Down syndrome - a cost sensitivity analysis
    Cuckle, Howard
    Benn, Peter
    Pergament, Eugene
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2013, 33 (07) : 636 - 642
  • [6] ESTIMATING A WOMANS RISK OF HAVING A PREGNANCY ASSOCIATED WITH DOWNS-SYNDROME USING HER AGE AND SERUM ALPHA-FETOPROTEIN LEVEL
    CUCKLE, HS
    WALD, NJ
    THOMPSON, SG
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1987, 94 (05): : 387 - 402
  • [7] Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening
    Dondorp, Wybo
    de Wert, Guido
    Bombard, Yvonne
    Bianchi, Diana W.
    Bergmann, Carsten
    Borry, Pascal
    Chitty, Lyn S.
    Fellmann, Florence
    Forzano, Francesca
    Hall, Alison
    Henneman, Lidewij
    Howard, Heidi C.
    Lucassen, Anneke
    Ormond, Kelly
    Peterlin, Borut
    Radojkovic, Dragica
    Rogowski, Wolf
    Soller, Maria
    Tibben, Aad
    Tranebjaerg, Lisbeth
    van El, Carla G.
    Cornel, Martina C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2015, 23 (11) : 1438 - 1450
  • [8] Prenatal Screening for Aneuploidy
    Driscoll, Deborah A.
    Gross, Susan
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (24) : 2556 - 2562
  • [9] Cell-free fetal DNA screening in the USA: a cost analysis of screening strategies
    Evans, M. I.
    Sonek, J. D.
    Hallahan, T. W.
    Krantz, D. A.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (01) : 74 - 83
  • [10] Impact of nuchal translucency credentialing by the FMF, the NTQR or both on screening distributions and performance
    Evans, M. I.
    Krantz, D. A.
    Hallahan, T. W.
    Sherwin, J.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 39 (02) : 181 - 184