Impact of Economic Freedom on Corruption Revisited in ASEAN Countries: A Bayesian Hierarchical Mixed-Effects Analysis

被引:8
作者
Thach, Nguyen Ngoc [1 ]
Ngoc, Bui Hoang [2 ]
机构
[1] Banking Univ Ho Chi Minh City, Inst Res Sci & Banking Technol, 39 Ham Nghi St,Dist 1, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
[2] Ho Chi Minh City Open Univ, Finance Econ & Management Res Grp, 97 Vo Van Tan St,Dist 3, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
关键词
economic freedom; corruption; economic growth; Bayesian hierarchical mixed-effects regression; ASEAN countries; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; REGRESSION; DIVERSIFICATION; GROWTH; INCOME; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/economies9010003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Conceptual and applied studies assessing the linkage between economic freedom and corruption expect that economic freedom boosts economic growth, improves income, and reduces levels of corruption. However, most of them have concentrated on developed and developing groups, while the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries have drawn much less attention. Empirical findings are most often conflicting. Moreover, previous studies performed rather simple frequentist techniques regressing one or some freedom indices on corruption that do not allow for grasping all the aspects of economic freedom as well as capturing variations across countries. The study aims to investigate the effects of ten components of economic freedom index on the level of corruption in ten ASEAN countries from 1999 to 2018. By applying a Bayesian hierarchical mixed-effects regression via a Monte Carlo technique combined with the Gibbs sampler, the obtained results suggest several findings as follows: (i) In view of probability, the predictors property rights, government integrity, tax burden, business freedom, labor freedom, and investment freedom have a strongly positive impact on the response perceived corruption index; (ii) Government spending, trade freedom, and financial freedom exert a strongly negative effect, while the influence of monetary freedom is ambiguous; and (iii) There is an existence of not only random intercepts but also random coefficients at the country level impacting the model outcome. The empirical outcome could be of major importance for more efficient corruption controlling in emerging countries, including ASEAN nations.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Financial development and economic growth in MENA countries [J].
Abid, Fathi ;
Bahloul, Slah ;
Mroua, Mourad .
JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2016, 38 (06) :1099-1117
[2]   Institutional causes, macroeconomic symptoms: volatility, crises and growth [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Johnson, S ;
Robinson, J ;
Thaicharoen, Y .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2003, 50 (01) :49-123
[3]   Was Prometheus unbound by chance? Risk, diversification, and growth [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Zilibotti, F .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1997, 105 (04) :709-751
[4]   Impact of financial development on SAARC'S human development [J].
Akhmat, Ghulam ;
Zaman, Khalid ;
Shukui, Tan .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2014, 48 (05) :2801-2816
[5]   Is globalization what it's cracked up to be? Economic freedom, corruption, and human development [J].
Akhter, SH .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2004, 39 (03) :283-295
[6]   Live free or bribe: On the causal dynamics between economic freedom and corruption in US states [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Dincer, Oguzhan C. ;
Payne, James E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2012, 28 (02) :215-226
[7]   Tolerance in the United States: Does economic freedom transform racial, religious, political and sexual attitudes? [J].
Berggren, Niclas ;
Nilsson, Therese .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2016, 45 :53-70
[8]   Do existing corruption levels matter in controlling corruption? Cross-country quantile regression estimates [J].
Billger, Sherrilyn M. ;
Goel, Rajeev K. .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2009, 90 (02) :299-305
[9]  
Block J., 2011, J. Fam. Bus. Strategy, V2, P232, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JFBS.2011.10.001
[10]   How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? [J].
Borensztein, E ;
De Gregorio, J ;
Lee, JW .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 45 (01) :115-135