Axillary nodal prognostic impact of two-dimensional tumor heterogeneity flux in breast cancer: evaluation via dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

被引:0
|
作者
Obeid, Jean-Pierre [1 ]
Stoyanova, Radka [1 ]
Zeidan, Youssef H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Miller Sch Med, Sylvester Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Miami, FL USA
[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Radiat Oncol, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
Breast cancer; heterogeneity; radiological analysis; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); TEXTURE ANALYSIS; MEDICAL IMAGES; MRI; ANGIOGENESIS; RADIOMICS; IRRADIATION; DISSECTION; PARAMETERS; PET/CT; MODEL;
D O I
10.21037/tcr.2017.01.02
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Breast cancer remains to have a high mortality toll in women worldwide. Several studies indicate benefit in identifying axillary nodal involvement towards effective patient risk stratification and treatment. Tumor heterogeneity recently emerged as a key factor impacting clinical outcomes. Voxel intensity gradient (VIG), a measure of contrast amongst radiological features of heterogeneity, harbors significance in determining intra-tumoral properties. Our project aims to apply the divergence theorem in correlating the 2-dimensional (2D) surface flux of this quantity to extra-tumoral axillary nodal involvement. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 47 patients with early stage breast cancer following surgery was accrued. Pathology information and preoperative dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) sequences were acquired. Tumor volumes were contoured and exported in slices for digital delineation, filtration, and computation. VIG and VIG divergence were approximated at every tumor pixel and divergence structurally summed. This measure of flux was normalized to tumor volume. Statistical analysis utilized Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients with leave-one-out (LOO) cross validation. Results: Among the 47 patients analyzed, 33 had T1 tumors with size (1.02 +/- 0.48 cm) and 14 had T2 tumors (3.10 +/- 0.86 cm). Normalized heterogeneity flux demonstrated significant correlation with axillary nodal ratio of positive to number collected: for non-sentinel ratio r= 0.57 (P= 0.001), and total node ratio r= 0.50 (P< 0.001). In nodal-positive patients r= 0.72 (P= 0.001) and r= 0.58 (P= 0.002), respectively. All mean squared errors were < 0.05. Conclusions: In quantifying heterogeneity departing the surface, flux mechanistically exhibited correlation with axillary nodal involvement. This correlation is optimally displayed in patients with nodal positivity. This novel radiological variable capable of characterizing tumor environment may be incorporated into future prognostic indices (nomograms) aimed at helping clinicians with axillary risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 187
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Correlations of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Morphologic, Angiogenic, and Molecular Prognostic Factors in Rectal Cancer
    Hong, Hye-Suk
    Kim, Se Hoon
    Park, Hae-Jeong
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Kim, Ki Whang
    Kim, Won Ho
    Kim, Nam Kyu
    Lee, Jae Mun
    Cho, Hyeon Je
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 54 (01) : 123 - 130
  • [22] Accuracy of conventional ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in assessing the size of breast cancer
    Shi, Xian-Quan
    Dong, Yunyun
    Tan, Xiaoqu
    Yang, Peipei
    Wang, Chunmei
    Feng, Wei
    Lin, Yuxuan
    Qian, Linxue
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2022, 82 (02) : 157 - 168
  • [23] Diagnostic role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating breast lesions
    Dakhil, Hussein Abed
    Easa, Ahmed Mohamedbaqer
    Hussein, Ammar Yaser
    Bustan, Raad Ajeel
    Najm, Hayder Suhail
    JOURNAL OF POPULATION THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 29 (02): : E88 - E94
  • [24] Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer
    Kim, Eun Young
    Youn, Inyoung
    Lee, Kwan Ho
    Yun, Ji-Sup
    Park, Yong Lai
    Park, Chan Heun
    Moon, Juhee
    Choi, Seon Hyeong
    Choi, Yoon Jung
    Ham, Soo-Youn
    Kook, Shin Ho
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2018, 21 (04) : 453 - 462
  • [25] Tumor Heterogeneity in Lung Cancer: Assessment with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
    Yoon, Soon Ho
    Park, Chang Min
    Park, Sang Joon
    Yoon, Jeong-Hwa
    Hahn, Seokyung
    Goo, Jin Mo
    RADIOLOGY, 2016, 280 (03) : 940 - 948
  • [26] Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer using Intra-peritumoral Textural Transition Analysis based on Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Zhan, Chenao
    Hu, Yiqi
    Wang, Xinrong
    Liu, Huan
    Xia, Liming
    Ai, Tao
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 29 : S107 - S115
  • [27] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
    Fu, Juzhong
    Fan, Ming
    Zheng, Bin
    Shao, Guoliang
    Zhang, Juan
    Li, Lihua
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2016: PACS AND IMAGING INFORMATICS: NEXT GENERATION AND INNOVATIONS, 2016, 9789
  • [28] Effectiveness of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating clinical responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Liu Yin-hua
    Ye Jing-ming
    Xu Ling
    Huang Qing-yun
    Zhao Jian-xin
    Duan Xue-ning
    Qin Nai-shan
    Wang Xiao-ying
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 124 (02) : 194 - 198
  • [29] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for risk stratification in patients with prostate cancer
    Park, Hyungin
    Kim, Seung Ho
    Kim, Joo Yeon
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 12 (01) : 742 - 751
  • [30] Can Supine Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging After a Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Provide Information for Supine Procedures?
    Kus, Ceyda Civan
    Guldogan, Nilgun
    Yilmaz, Ebru
    Soyder, Aykut
    Arslan, Aydan
    Aribal, M. Erkin
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2023, 47 (04) : 561 - 568