Urban flood risk mapping using the GARP and QUEST models: A comparative study of machine learning techniques

被引:285
|
作者
Darabi, Hamid [1 ]
Choubin, Bahram [2 ]
Rahmati, Omid [3 ]
Haghighi, Ali Torabi [1 ]
Pradhan, Biswajeet [4 ,5 ]
Klove, Bjorn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Water Resources & Environm Engn, POB 4300, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland
[2] Univ Tehran, Fac Nat Resources, Dept Reclamat Arid & Mt Reg, Karaj, Iran
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Khorramabad Branch, Young Researchers & Elites Club, Khorramabad, Iran
[4] Univ Technol Sydney, Ctr Adv Modelling & Geospatial Informat Syst, Sch Informat Syst & Modelling, Fac Engn & IT, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[5] Sejong Univ, Dept Energy & Mineral Resources Engn, 209 Neungdong Ro, Seoul 05006, South Korea
关键词
Urban planning; Flood risk management; GIS; FANP; Data-mining; DECISION-TREE MODEL; FUZZY DEMATEL; POTENTIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS; CLASSIFICATION; PREDICTION; HAZARD; GIS; MAXENT; INSIGHTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.002
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Flood risk mapping and modeling is important to prevent urban flood damage. In this study, a flood risk map was produced with limited hydrological and hydraulic data using two state-of-the-art machine learning models: Genetic Algorithm Rule-Set Production (GARP) and Quick Unbiased Efficient Statistical Tree (QUEST). The flood conditioning factors used in modeling were: precipitation, slope, curve number, distance to river, distance to channel, depth to groundwater, land use, and elevation. Based on available reports and field surveys for Sari city (Iran), 113 points were identified as flooded areas (with each flooded zone assigned a value of 1). Different conditioning factors, including urban density, quality of buildings, age of buildings, population density, and socio-economic conditions, were taken into account to analyze flood vulnerability. In addition, the weight of these conditioning factors was determined based on expert knowledge and Fuzzy Analytical Network Process (FANP). An urban flood risk map was then produced using flood hazard and flood vulnerability maps. The area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) and Kappa statistic were applied to evaluate model performance. The results demonstrated that the GARP model (AUC-ROC = 93.5%, Kappa = 0.86) had higher performance accuracy than the QUEST model (AUC-ROC = 89.2%, Kappa = 0.79). The results also indicated that distance to channel, land use, and elevation played major roles in flood hazard determination, whereas population density, quality of buildings, and urban density were the most important factors in terms of vulnerability. These findings demonstrate that machine learning models can help in flood risk mapping, especially in areas where detailed hydraulic and hydrological data are not available.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 154
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Urban flood hazard mapping using machine learning models: GARP, RF, MaxEnt and NB
    Mahya Norallahi
    Hesam Seyed Kaboli
    Natural Hazards, 2021, 106 : 119 - 137
  • [2] Urban flood hazard mapping using machine learning models: GARP, RF, MaxEnt and NB
    Norallahi, Mahya
    Kaboli, Hesam Seyed
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2021, 106 (01) : 119 - 137
  • [3] Hazard and vulnerability in urban flood risk mapping: Machine learning techniques and considering the role of urban districts
    Eini, Mohammad
    Kaboli, Hesam Seyed
    Rashidian, Mohsen
    Hedayat, Hossein
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2020, 50
  • [4] Enhancing flood risk assessment in urban areas by integrating hydrodynamic models and machine learning techniques
    Khoshkonesh, Alireza
    Nazari, Rouzbeh
    Nikoo, Mohammad Reza
    Karimi, Maryam
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 952
  • [5] Comparative assessment of bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models for mapping flood proneness
    Al-Abadi, Alaa M.
    Al-Najar, Noor A.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2020, 100 (02) : 461 - 491
  • [6] Comparative assessment of bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models for mapping flood proneness
    Alaa M. Al-Abadi
    Noor A. Al-Najar
    Natural Hazards, 2020, 100 : 461 - 491
  • [7] Classification machine learning models for urban flood hazard mapping: case study of Zaio, NE Morocco
    Baida, Maelaynayn El
    Boushaba, Farid
    Chourak, Mimoun
    Hosni, Mohamed
    Sabar, Hichame
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2024, 120 (11) : 10013 - 10041
  • [8] Flood risk mapping and analysis using an integrated framework of machine learning models and analytic hierarchy process
    Quynh Duy Bui
    Chinh Luu
    Sy Hung Mai
    Hang Thi Ha
    Huong Thu Ta
    Binh Thai Pham
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2023, 43 (07) : 1478 - 1495
  • [9] Flash flood susceptibility mapping using stacking ensemble machine learning models
    Ilia, Loanna
    Tsangaratos, Paraskevas
    Tzampoglou, Ploutarchos
    Chen, Wei
    Hong, Haoyuan
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (27) : 15010 - 15036
  • [10] Identifying the essential flood conditioning factors for flood prone area mapping using machine learning techniques
    Tehrany, Mahyat Shafapour
    Jones, Simon
    Shabani, Farzin
    CATENA, 2019, 175 : 174 - 192