An interactive computer program can effectively educate patients about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility

被引:104
作者
Green, MJ
Biesecker, BB
McInerney, AM
Mauger, D
Fost, N
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Humanities, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Milton S Hershey Med Ctr, Gen Internal Med Sect, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[3] NHGRI, Med Genet Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Penn State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Hlth Evaluat Sci, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Pediat, Madison, WI USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS | 2001年 / 103卷 / 01期
关键词
genetic counseling; genetic testing; genetic education; informed consent; ethics; BRCA1/BRCA2;
D O I
10.1002/ajmg.1500
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
As genetic testing for susceptibility to breast cancer becomes more widespread, alternative methods for educating individuals prior to testing will be needed. Our objective was to compare face-to-face education and counseling by a genetic counselor with education by an interactive computer program, assessing the effects of each on knowledge of breast cancer genetics and intent to undergo genetic testing. We used a randomized, controlled trial. Seventy-two self-referred women with a first-degree relative with breast cancer received outpatient education and counseling at the Clinical Center of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Twenty-nine received individualized counseling from a genetic counselor (counseling group), 29 received education from an interactive computer program followed by individualized counseling (computer group), and 14 were controls. Both pre- and postintervention assessment of knowledge about breast cancer genetics and intent to undergo genetic testing were measured. The control group participants correctly answered 74% of the knowledge questions; the counselor group, 92%; and the computer group, 96% (P < .0001). Unadjusted mean knowledge scores were significantly higher in the computer group than the counselor group (P =.048), but they were equivalent when adjusted for demographic differences (P = 0.34). Intent to undergo genetic testing was influenced by the interventions: preintervention, a majority in all groups (69%) indicated that they were likely (definitely and most likely) to undergo testing; after either intervention coupled with counseling, only 44% indicated that they were likely to do so (P =.0002; odds ratio = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.7-4.9). We concluded that a computer program can successfully educate patients about breast cancer susceptibility, and, along with genetic counseling, can influence patients' intentions to undergo genetic testing. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 23
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Utility of a mainstreamed genetic testing pathway in breast and ovarian cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Benusiglio, Patrick R.
    Korenbaum, Clement
    Vibert, Roseline
    Ezenfis, Joel
    Geoffron, Sophie
    Paul, Charlotte
    Richard, Sandrine
    Byrde, Veronique
    Lejeune, Manon
    Guillerm, Erell
    Basset, Noemie
    Lotz, Jean-Pierre
    Chabbert-Buffet, Nathalie
    Gligorov, Joseph
    Coulet, Florence
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2020, 63 (12)
  • [42] Issues of concern in risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing of younger breast cancer patients in Japan
    Bando, Hiroko
    BREAST CANCER, 2014, 21 (06) : 656 - 663
  • [43] Satisfaction with Physician Recommendation for and Information About Genetic Counseling Among Breast Cancer Patients
    Vadaparampil, Susan T.
    Quinn, Gwendolyn P.
    Lee, Ji-Hyun
    Malo, Teri
    Zhao, Xiuhua
    Miree, Cheryl
    Brzosowicz, Jennifer
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2011, 17 (01) : 79 - 82
  • [44] Mainstreamed genetic testing of breast cancer patients in two hospitals in South Eastern Norway
    Grindedal, Eli Marie
    Jorgensen, Kjersti
    Olsson, Pernilla
    Gravdehaug, Berit
    Luras, Hilde
    Schlichting, Ellen
    Vamre, Tone
    Wangensteen, Teresia
    Heramb, Cecilie
    Maehle, Lovise
    FAMILIAL CANCER, 2020, 19 (02) : 133 - 142
  • [45] Genetic testing in a cohort of young patients with HER2-amplified breast cancer
    Eccles, D. M.
    Li, N.
    Handwerker, R.
    Maishman, T.
    Copson, E. R.
    Durcan, L. T.
    Gerty, S. M.
    Jones, L.
    Evans, D. G.
    Haywood, L.
    Campbell, I.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27 (03) : 467 - 473
  • [46] Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients
    Claes, E
    Evers-Kiebooms, G
    Boogaerts, A
    Decruyenaere, M
    Denayer, L
    Legius, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2003, 116A (01) : 11 - 19
  • [47] Mainstreamed genetic testing of breast cancer patients in two hospitals in South Eastern Norway
    Eli Marie Grindedal
    Kjersti Jørgensen
    Pernilla Olsson
    Berit Gravdehaug
    Hilde Lurås
    Ellen Schlichting
    Tone Vamre
    Teresia Wangensteen
    Cecilie Heramb
    Lovise Mæhle
    Familial Cancer, 2020, 19 : 133 - 142
  • [48] Mainstream genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer provides a solid basis for patients to make a well-informed decision about genetic testing
    Kyra Bokkers
    Eveline M. A. Bleiker
    Jacob P. Hoogendam
    Mary E. Velthuizen
    Henk W. R. Schreuder
    Cornelis G. Gerestein
    Joost G. Lange
    Jacqueline A. Louwers
    Marco J. Koudijs
    Margreet G. E. M. Ausems
    Ronald P. Zweemer
    Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, 20
  • [49] Mainstream genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer provides a solid basis for patients to make a well-informed decision about genetic testing
    Bokkers, Kyra
    Bleiker, Eveline M. A.
    Hoogendam, Jacob P.
    Velthuizen, Mary E.
    Schreuder, Henk W. R.
    Gerestein, Cornelis G.
    Lange, Joost G.
    Louwers, Jacqueline A.
    Koudijs, Marco J.
    Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
    Zweemer, Ronald P.
    HEREDITARY CANCER IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [50] INTEREST IN GENETIC TESTING AMONG FIRST-DEGREE RELATIVES OF BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS
    LERMAN, C
    SEAY, J
    BALSHEM, A
    AUDRAIN, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1995, 57 (03): : 385 - 392