An interactive computer program can effectively educate patients about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility

被引:104
作者
Green, MJ
Biesecker, BB
McInerney, AM
Mauger, D
Fost, N
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Humanities, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Milton S Hershey Med Ctr, Gen Internal Med Sect, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[3] NHGRI, Med Genet Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Penn State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Hlth Evaluat Sci, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Pediat, Madison, WI USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS | 2001年 / 103卷 / 01期
关键词
genetic counseling; genetic testing; genetic education; informed consent; ethics; BRCA1/BRCA2;
D O I
10.1002/ajmg.1500
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
As genetic testing for susceptibility to breast cancer becomes more widespread, alternative methods for educating individuals prior to testing will be needed. Our objective was to compare face-to-face education and counseling by a genetic counselor with education by an interactive computer program, assessing the effects of each on knowledge of breast cancer genetics and intent to undergo genetic testing. We used a randomized, controlled trial. Seventy-two self-referred women with a first-degree relative with breast cancer received outpatient education and counseling at the Clinical Center of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Twenty-nine received individualized counseling from a genetic counselor (counseling group), 29 received education from an interactive computer program followed by individualized counseling (computer group), and 14 were controls. Both pre- and postintervention assessment of knowledge about breast cancer genetics and intent to undergo genetic testing were measured. The control group participants correctly answered 74% of the knowledge questions; the counselor group, 92%; and the computer group, 96% (P < .0001). Unadjusted mean knowledge scores were significantly higher in the computer group than the counselor group (P =.048), but they were equivalent when adjusted for demographic differences (P = 0.34). Intent to undergo genetic testing was influenced by the interventions: preintervention, a majority in all groups (69%) indicated that they were likely (definitely and most likely) to undergo testing; after either intervention coupled with counseling, only 44% indicated that they were likely to do so (P =.0002; odds ratio = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.7-4.9). We concluded that a computer program can successfully educate patients about breast cancer susceptibility, and, along with genetic counseling, can influence patients' intentions to undergo genetic testing. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 23
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Attitudes of Physicians Regarding Receiving and Storing Patients' Genetic Testing Results for Cancer Susceptibility
    Linda M. Wasserman
    Oliver W. Jones
    John S. Trombold
    Georgia R. Sadler
    Journal of Community Health, 2000, 25 : 305 - 313
  • [32] Demographic Barriers for Genetic Testing in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients in the Northern Michigan Area
    Hebert, Danielle
    Pacheco, Felipe
    WintonLi, Lisa
    Taj, Asma
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [33] Preoperative genetic testing affects surgical decision making in breast cancer patients
    Lokich, Elizabeth
    Stuckey, Ashley
    Raker, Christina
    Wilbur, Jennifer Scalia
    Laprise, Jessica
    Gass, Jennifer
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 134 (02) : 326 - 330
  • [34] Breadth of Genetic Testing Selected by Patients at Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer
    Szender, J. Brian
    Kaur, Jasmine
    Clayback, Katherine
    Hutton, Mollie L.
    Mikkelson, June
    Odunsi, Kunle
    Dresbold, Cara
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2018, 28 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [35] Psychological interventions and genetic testing: Facilitating informed decisions about BRCA1/2 cancer susceptibility
    Shoda, Y
    Mischel, W
    Miller, SM
    Diefenbach, M
    Daly, MB
    Engstrom, PF
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY IN MEDICAL SETTINGS, 1998, 5 (01) : 3 - 17
  • [36] What Can Interest Tell Us about Uptake of Genetic Testing? Intention and Behavior amongst Smokers Related to Patients with Lung Cancer
    Sanderson, S. C.
    O'Neill, S. C.
    Bastian, L. A.
    Bepler, G.
    McBride, C. M.
    PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2010, 13 (02) : 116 - 124
  • [37] Communication about breast cancer genetic counseling with patients with limited health literacy or a migrant background: evaluation of a training program for healthcare professionals
    van der Giessen, Jeanine
    Fransen, Mirjam P.
    Spreeuwenberg, Peter
    Velthuizen, Mary
    van Dulmen, Sandra
    Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY GENETICS, 2021, 12 (01) : 91 - 99
  • [38] Psychological Interventions and Genetic Testing: Facilitating Informed Decisions About BRCA1/2 Cancer Susceptibility
    Yuichi Shoda
    Walter Mischel
    Suzanne M. Miller
    Michael Diefenbach
    Mary B. Daly
    Paul F. Engstrom
    Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 1998, 5 : 3 - 17
  • [39] Communication about breast cancer genetic counseling with patients with limited health literacy or a migrant background: evaluation of a training program for healthcare professionals
    Jeanine van der Giessen
    Mirjam P. Fransen
    Peter Spreeuwenberg
    Mary Velthuizen
    Sandra van Dulmen
    Margreet G. E. M. Ausems
    Journal of Community Genetics, 2021, 12 : 91 - 99
  • [40] Issues of concern in risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing of younger breast cancer patients in Japan
    Hiroko Bando
    Breast Cancer, 2014, 21 : 656 - 663