Choosy beetles: How host trees and southern boreal forest naturalness may determine dead wood beetle communities

被引:12
作者
Burner, Ryan C. [1 ]
Birkemoe, Tone [1 ]
Stephan, Jorg G. [2 ]
Drag, Lukas [3 ]
Muller, Joerg [3 ,4 ]
Ovaskainen, Otso [5 ]
Potterf, Maria [6 ]
Skarpaas, Olav [7 ]
Snall, Tord [2 ]
Sverdrup-Thygeson, Anne [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Fac Environm Sci & Nat Resource Management, As, Norway
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Swedish Species Informat Ctr, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Univ Wurzburg, Bioctr, Dept Anim Ecol & Trop Biol, Field Stn Fabrikschleichach, Glashuttenstr 5, D-96181 Rauhenebrach, Germany
[4] Bavarian Forest Natl Pk, Freyunger Str 2, D-94481 Grafenau, Germany
[5] Univ Helsinki, Organismal & Evolutionary Biol Res Programme, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Biol & Environm Sci, POB 35, Jyvaskyla 40014, Finland
[7] Univ Oslo, Nat Hist Museum, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Coleoptera; Indicator species; Joint species distribution models ([!text type='JS']JS[!/text]DMs); Near-natural forest; Red-listed species; Saproxylic beetles; SAPROXYLIC BEETLES; SPECIES RICHNESS; PINE FORESTS; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; ASSEMBLAGES; POPULATIONS; COLEOPTERA; LANDSCAPE; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119023
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Wood-living beetles make up a large proportion of forest biodiversity and contribute to important ecosystem services, including decomposition. Beetle communities in managed southern boreal forests are less species rich than in natural and near-natural forest stands. In addition, many beetle species rely primarily on specific tree species. Yet, the associations between individual beetle species, forest management category, and tree species are seldom quantified, even for red-listed beetles. We compiled a beetle capture dataset from flight intercept traps placed on Norway spruce (Picea abies), oak (Quercus sp.), and Eurasian aspen (Populus tremulae) trees in 413 sites in mature managed forest, near-natural forest, and clear-cuts in southeastern Norway. We used joint species distribution models to estimate the strength of associations for 368 saproxylic beetle species (including 20 vulnerable, endangered, or critical red-listed species) for each forest management category and tree species. Tree species on which traps were mounted had the largest effect on beetle communities; oaks had the most highly associated beetle species, including most of the red-listed species, followed by Norway spruce and Eurasian aspen. Most beetle species were more likely to be captured in near-natural than in mature managed forest. Our estimated associations were compatible ? for many species ? with categorical classifications found in several existing databases of saproxylic beetle preferences. These quantitative beetle-habitat associations will improve future analyses that have typically relied on categorical classifications. Our results highlight the need to prioritize conservation of near-natural forests and oak trees in Scandinavia to protect the habitat of many red-listed species in particular. Furthermore, we underline the importance of carefully considering the species of trees on which traps are mounted in order to representatively sample beetle communities in forest stands.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [31] Ovaskainen O., 2020, JOINT SPECIES DISTRI
  • [32] How to make more out of community data? A conceptual framework and its implementation as models and software
    Ovaskainen, Otso
    Tikhonov, Gleb
    Norberg, Anna
    Blanchet, F. Guillaume
    Duan, Leo
    Dunson, David
    Roslin, Tomas
    Abrego, Nerea
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 20 (05) : 561 - 576
  • [33] Biodiversity Differences between Managed and Unmanaged Forests: Meta-Analysis of Species Richness in Europe
    Paillet, Yoan
    Berges, Laurent
    Hjalten, Joakim
    Odor, Peter
    Avon, Catherine
    Bernhardt-Roemermann, Markus
    Bijlsma, Rienk-Jan
    De Bruyn, Luc
    Fuhr, Marc
    Grandin, Ulf
    Kanka, Robert
    Lundin, Lars
    Luque, Sandra
    Magura, Tibor
    Matesanz, Silvia
    Meszaros, Ilona
    Teresa Sebastia, M. -
    Schmidt, Wolfgang
    Standovar, Tibor
    Tothmeresz, Bela
    Uotila, Anneli
    Valladares, Fernando
    Vellak, Kai
    Virtanen, Risto
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 24 (01) : 101 - 112
  • [34] Polypore diversity in managed and old-growth boreal Picea abies forests in southern Finland
    Penttilä, R
    Siitonen, J
    Kuusinen, M
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 117 (03) : 271 - 283
  • [35] Long-lasting effects of logging on beetles in hollow oaks
    Pilskog, Hanne E.
    Sverdrup-Thygeson, Anne
    Evju, Marianne
    Framstad, Erik
    Birkemoe, Tone
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2018, 8 (20): : 10126 - 10137
  • [36] Morphological traits predict host-tree specialization in wood-inhabiting fungal communities
    Purhonen, Jenna
    Ovaskainen, Otso
    Halme, Panu
    Komonen, Atte
    Huhtinen, Seppo
    Kotiranta, Heikki
    Laessoe, Thomas
    Abrego, Nerea
    [J]. FUNGAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 46
  • [37] Tree microhabitats as indicators of bird and bat communities in Mediterranean forests
    Regnery, Baptiste
    Couvet, Denis
    Kubarek, Loren
    Julien, Jean-Francois
    Kerbiriou, Christian
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 34 : 221 - 230
  • [38] phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things)
    Revell, Liam J.
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2012, 3 (02): : 217 - 223
  • [39] Examining the microclimate hypothesis in Amazonian birds: indirect tests of the 'visual constraints' mechanism
    Rutt, Cameron L.
    Midway, Stephen R.
    Jirinec, Vitek
    Wolfe, Jared D.
    Stouffer, Philip C.
    [J]. OIKOS, 2019, 128 (06) : 798 - 810
  • [40] Natural disturbances in the European forests in the 19th and 20th centuries
    Schelhaas, MJ
    Nabuurs, GJ
    Schuck, A
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2003, 9 (11) : 1620 - 1633