Future Orientation and Political Participation: The Moderating Role of Political Trust

被引:6
作者
Knudsen, Mikkel Stein [1 ,2 ]
Christensen, Henrik Serup [3 ]
机构
[1] Abo Akad Univ, Fac Social Sci Business & Econ, Turku, Finland
[2] Univ Turku, Finland Futures Res Ctr, Turku, Finland
[3] Abo Akad Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Turku, Finland
来源
FRONTIERS IN POLITICAL SCIENCE | 2021年 / 3卷
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 芬兰科学院;
关键词
future orientation; political participation; considerations of future consequences; political trust; time perspective; MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS; IMMEDIATE; SUPPORT; GRATIFICATION; CONSEQUENCES; PREFERENCE; PATIENCE; DECISION; POLICY; IMAGES;
D O I
10.3389/fpos.2021.791467
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Previous studies show consistent differences in how people evaluate future consequences and implications of this for a variety of phenomena. The implications for the individual propensity for taking part in different forms of political participation have received limited scholarly attention, however. This is unfortunate since it affects how people voice their concerns over future problems and thereby also whether and how decision-makers become aware of these concerns. We here examine this in a cross-sectional study conducted in Finland (N = 1,673). We apply the Considerations of Future Consequences (CFC) framework as a measure of individuals' future orientation and distinguish between considerations of future consequences (CFC-future) and considerations of immediate consequences (CFC-Immediate). We study the direct associations with institutionalized and non-institutionalized political participation and the moderating role of political trust in shaping these associations. Our results show CFC-future has a positive association with both institutionalized and non-institutionalized political participation, while CFC-immediate has a negative association with participation. Political trust moderates the association with non-institutionalized political participation since the association is stronger for citizens with low political trust. This may suggest that citizens use particular participatory avenues to communicate their worries over future problems, and to which decision-makers must be attentive.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Immigration, political trust, and Brexit - Testing an aversion amplification hypothesis [J].
Abrams, Dominic ;
Travaglino, Giovanni A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 57 (02) :310-326
[2]   Individual futures consciousness: Psychology behind the five-dimensional Futures Consciousness scale [J].
Ahvenharju, Sanna ;
Lalot, Fanny ;
Minkkinen, Matti ;
Quiamzade, Alain .
FUTURES, 2021, 128
[3]   The five dimensions of Futures Consciousness [J].
Ahvenharju, Sanna ;
Minkkinen, Matti ;
Lalot, Fanny .
FUTURES, 2018, 104 :1-13
[4]   When trust matters-a multilevel analysis of the effect of generalized trust on political participation in 25 European democracies [J].
Back, Maria ;
Christensen, Henrik Serup .
JOURNAL OF CIVIL SOCIETY, 2016, 12 (02) :178-197
[5]   "Time's Up!": Framing Collective Impatience for Radical Political Change [J].
Basta, Karlo .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 41 (04) :755-770
[6]   Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes [J].
Bickel, WK ;
Marsch, LA .
ADDICTION, 2001, 96 (01) :73-86
[7]   Constructing a Performance Measure of Future Time Orientation [J].
Biondolillo, Mathew ;
Epstein, Leonard .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2021, 103 (02) :278-288
[8]   A two-level analysis of public support: Exploring the role of beliefs in opinions about the Swiss energy strategy [J].
Blumer, Y. B. ;
Braunreiter, L. ;
Kachi, A. ;
Lordan-Perret, R. ;
Oeri, F. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 43 :109-118
[9]  
Borg S., 2020, PUBLICATIONS MINISTR, P5
[10]   Immediate rewards or delayed gratification? A conjoint survey experiment of the public's policy preferences [J].
Christensen, Henrik Serup ;
Rapeli, Lauri .
POLICY SCIENCES, 2021, 54 (01) :63-94