Finasteride versus dutasteride: A real-world economic evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
Fenter, Thomas C. [1 ]
Runken, M. Chris [1 ]
Black, Libby [1 ]
Eaddy, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Blue Cross & Blue Shield Mississippi, Jackson, MS 39215 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE | 2007年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
MEN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:The objective of this study was to assess the economic differences between dutasteride and finasteride patients within the first year of initiating treatment. Methods: A retrospective analysis using the PharMetrics Integrated Medical and Pharmaceutical Database (Watertown, Mass) was conducted to assess economic differences in patients who were initiated on dutasteride or finasteride. The database is nationally representative, encompassing administrative claims from more than 45 million patients within 85 managed healthcare plans. Male patients aged 50 years with a diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia who began 5-alpha reductase inhibitor (5ARI) treatment (dutasteride or finasteride) between January 1, 1999, and March 1, 2005, were identified. Patients eligible for study inclusion were matched (1 dutasteride: 3 finasteride) on 4 variables (measured during the 6-month period before their first 5ARI prescription): age, presence of acute urinary retention, total amount of enlarged prostate (EP)-specific charges (+/- $1), and the duration of follow-up (measured in months). EP-specific charges were defined as the total amount charged for EP-specific physician visits, inpatient hospitalizations, outpatient hospital care, emergency department visits, and other ancillary services during the follow-up period for each patient, expressed as average monthly costs. Results: Overall, patients incurred $121.04 in EP-specific charges per month, with inpatient hospitalizations making up 39.1% ($47.29) of the total costs of care. Physician office visits constituted 33.6% ($40.66) of monthly charges. When comparing differences among patients taking the two 5ARIs, patients taking dutasteride incurred $20.50 less per month in EP-specific charges than patients taking finasteride ($105.67 vs $126.17, P =.0007). This reduction in overall medical utilization resulted from a lower amount of inpatient hospitalization charges for dutasteride patients. Conclusion: Patients treated with dutasteride incurred $20.50 less per month in medical costs than patients treated with finasteride. Healthcare plans should consider the incremental differences in medical costs along with the difference in pharmaceutical expenditures when evaluating these two 5ARIs.
引用
收藏
页码:S23 / S27
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative economic evaluation of dutasteride versus finasteride for Medicare-aged men with benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Lin, P. J.
    Shah, M.
    Davis, E. A.
    Hogue, S. L.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (03) : A305 - A305
  • [2] Economic evaluation of adalimumab versus etanercept for psoriatic arthritis in a Brazilian real-world model
    da Silva, Michael Ruberson Ribeiro
    Dos Santos, Jessica Barreto Ribeiro
    Almeida, Alessandra Maciel
    Alvares-Teodoro, Juliana
    Acurcio, Francisco De Assis
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (03) : 473 - 479
  • [3] Comparison of Finasteride and Dutasteride on Risk of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Pooled Analysis of 15 Real-world Databases
    Yang, Dae Yul
    Seo, Won-Woo
    Park, Rae Woong
    Rhee, Sang Youl
    Cha, Jae Myung
    Hah, Yoon Soo
    Jeong, Chang Won
    Kim, Kyung-Jin
    Yang, Hyeon-Jong
    Kim, Do Kyung
    Ha, Ji Yong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2025, 43 (01): : 188 - 196
  • [4] A FRAMEWORK FOR REAL-WORLD ECONOMIC EVALUATION BY INCORPORATING IMPLEMENTATION PARAMETERS
    Grutters, J. P.
    Joore, M. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A563 - A563
  • [5] Real-world evaluation of economic burden for diabetic gastroparesis in the US
    Chen, Y. J.
    Huang, Z.
    Luo, M.
    Pang, H.
    Almansa, C.
    Dukes, G. E.
    Parkman, H. P.
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2019, 31
  • [6] Economic evaluation of personalized medicine: a call for real-world data
    Terkola, Robert
    Antonanzas, Fernando
    Postma, Maarten
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2017, 18 (09): : 1065 - 1067
  • [7] Economic evaluation of personalized medicine: a call for real-world data
    Robert Terkola
    Fernando Antoñanzas
    Maarten Postma
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2017, 18 : 1065 - 1067
  • [8] Evaluation of data reporting in real-world (RW) publications in clinical versus health economic (HE) journals
    Mitsch, Alaina
    McDonough, Jason
    Brooks, Kimberly
    Brant, Erin
    Mehra, Anisha
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2018, 34 : 20 - 20
  • [9] Real-world lab versus real-world experiment: What makes the difference?
    Parodi, Oliver
    Ober, Susanne
    Lang, Daniel J.
    Albiez, Marius
    GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2024, 33 (02): : 216 - 221
  • [10] Real-world evaluation of economic burden for diabetic gastroparesis in the United States
    Chen, Y. J.
    Huang, Z.
    Luo, M.
    Pang, H.
    Almansa, C.
    Dukes, G.
    Parkman, H. P.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2019, 62 : S398 - S398