The learning effect in visual field testing of healthy subjects using frequency doubling technology

被引:41
作者
Horani, A [1 ]
Frenkel, S [1 ]
Yahalom, C [1 ]
Farber, MD [1 ]
Ticho, U [1 ]
Blumenthal, EZ [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Ophthalmol, Hadassah Univ Hosp, Hadassah Med Sch, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
frequency doubling technology; glaucoma; glaucoma-diagnosis; learning effect; visual fields;
D O I
10.1097/00061198-200212000-00011
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the presence, duration and magnitude of a learning effect in serial visual field (VF) testing, using the commercially available frequency doubling technology (FDT) instrument. Patients and Methods: 21 healthy adults with no prior VF experience underwent 6 serial VF tests, using the full-threshold C-20 program of the Zeiss-Humphrey FDT analyzer, on one randomly chosen eye. Tests were spaced at least two days apart. Results: The average mean sensitivity was 32.37 +/- 2.6 dB; the average mean deviation (MD) was 1.22 +/- 1.8 dB. The MD at the first examination (0.28 +/- 2.1 dB) was significantly poorer than at any of the other testing sessions (p<0.003). Similarly, the mean sensitivity at the first examination (31.16 +/- 3.0 dB) was significantly lower than any other testing session (p<0.004). The proportion of improvement from the first to the second session was 63% and 65% of the total improvement, for mean sensitivity and MD, respectively. Mean test duration showed a modest reduction, from 4.40 +/- 0.3 minutes in the first session to 4.17 +/- 0.4 minutes in the last session (p = 0.023). A sub-analysis comparison of the different VF segments showed a more prominent learning effect in the peripheral and nasal visual segments (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Baseline measurements should best rely on the second testing session, since MD and mean sensitivity are somewhat poorer when subjects with no prior VF experience are first tested on the FDT instrument. This may be especially true for the purpose of following patients over time.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 516
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Frequency doubling technology perimetry for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss [J].
Alward, WLM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 129 (03) :376-378
[2]  
Anderson AJ, 2002, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V43, P398
[3]   Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with Humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice [J].
Burnstein, Y ;
Ellish, NJ ;
Magbalon, M ;
Higginbotham, EJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 129 (03) :328-333
[4]   Clinical comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry [J].
Casson, R ;
James, B ;
Rubinstein, A ;
Ali, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 85 (03) :360-362
[5]   Learning effect for frequency doubling perimetry in patients with glaucoma [J].
Fujimoto, N ;
Minowa, K ;
Miyauchi, O ;
Hanawa, T ;
Adachi-Usami, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 133 (02) :269-270
[6]   THE EFFECT OF PERIMETRIC EXPERIENCE IN NORMAL SUBJECTS [J].
HEIJL, A ;
LINDGREN, G ;
OLSSON, J .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1989, 107 (01) :81-86
[7]   The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma [J].
Heijl, A ;
Bengtsson, B .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 114 (01) :19-22
[8]   Learning effect, short-term fluctuation, and long-term fluctuation in frequency doubling technique [J].
Iester, M ;
Capris, P ;
Pandolfo, A ;
Zingirian, M ;
Traverso, CE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 130 (02) :160-164
[9]  
Ito A, 2001, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V42, P1107
[10]  
Johnson CA, 1997, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V38, P413