Recovery after ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy compared with conventional surgery for varicose veins

被引:29
|
作者
Darvall, K. A. L. [1 ]
Bate, G. R. [1 ]
Adam, D. J. [1 ]
Bradbury, A. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Dept Vasc Surg, Heart England NHS Trust, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; ENDOVENOUS LASER-ABLATION; SUPERFICIAL VENOUS SURGERY; SAPHENOUS-VEIN; NERVE INJURY; LIGATION; PATIENT; OBLITERATION; OPERATION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.6754
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The advantages of minimally invasive alternatives such as ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) over conventional surgery for the treatment of varicose veins include lower morbidity and faster recovery times. The aim was to compare morbidity, analgesia use, and time to return to driving and work following UGFS with those reported after conventional surgery for varicose veins. Methods. Patients who had UGFS or surgery for varicose veins were sent a questionnaire 4 weeks after treatment. Results: A total of 332 (84.9 per cent) of 391 patients who had UGFS and 53 (56 per cent) of 94 who had surgery returned a questionnaire. The groups were similar in terms of age, sex, and the proportion who had treatment of bilateral or recurrent veins. Patients who had surgery were more likely to have significant bruising (44 versus 7-2 per cent; P < 0.001) and pain (17 versus 5.5 per cent; P = 0.001). After UGFS, 43.2 per cent of patients returned to work within 24 h compared with none who had surgery (P < 0.001). Patients who had UGFS were more likely to return to driving within 4 days (P = 0.014). Conclusion: UGFS was associated with less pain and analgesia requirement, time off work and quicker return to driving.
引用
收藏
页码:1262 / 1267
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicose veins
    Darke, S. G.
    Baker, S. J. A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (08) : 969 - 974
  • [2] Recovery after ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy compared with conventional surgery for varicose veins (Br J Surg 2009; 96: 1262-1267) Reply
    Darvall, K. A. L.
    Bate, G. R.
    Adam, D. J.
    Bradbury, A. W.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 (03) : 457 - 458
  • [3] Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for the treatment of primary varicose veins
    Bountouroglou, D
    Geroulakos, G
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2004, 19 (03) : 107 - 108
  • [4] Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in the treatment of varicose veins: tips and tricks
    de Zeeuw, R
    Toonder, IM
    Wittens, CHA
    Loots, MAM
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2005, 20 (04) : 159 - 162
  • [5] Treatment of recurrent varicose veins using ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy
    Welchman, S. A.
    Elstone, A.
    Ashley, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 : 200 - 200
  • [6] Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy as the primary treatment modality for varicose veins
    Welchman, S. A.
    Elstone, A.
    Ashley, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 : 200 - 200
  • [7] Results of Surgical Treatment Compared with Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients with Varicose Veins: A Prospective Randomised Study
    Figueiredo, M.
    Araujo, S.
    Barros, N., Jr.
    Miranda, F., Jr.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 38 (06) : 758 - 763
  • [8] Effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for recurrent varicose veins: Immediate results
    Kakkos, Stavros K.
    Bountouroglou, Dimitrios G.
    Azzam, Mustafa
    Kalodiki, Evi
    Daskalopoulos, Marios
    Geroulakos, George
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2006, 13 (03) : 357 - 364
  • [9] Microfoam ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy of varicose veins in 100 legs
    Barrett, JM
    Allen, B
    Ockelford, A
    Goldman, MP
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2004, 30 (01) : 6 - 12
  • [10] Patients' Expectations before and Satisfaction after Ultrasound Guided Foam Sclerotherapy for Varicose Veins
    Darvall, K. A. L.
    Bate, G. R.
    Sam, R. C.
    Adam, D. J.
    Silverman, S. H.
    Bradbury, A. W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 38 (05) : 642 - 647