pH, Ionic strength and flow velocity effects on the NOM filtration with TiO2/ZrO2 membranes

被引:24
作者
de la Rubia, Angeles [1 ]
Rodriguez, Manuel [1 ]
Prats, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alicante, Water & Environm Sci Inst, Alicante 03080, Spain
关键词
ceramic membrane; humic substances; ultrafiltration; zeta potential;
D O I
10.1016/j.seppur.2006.05.007
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The effects of pH, ionic strength and flow velocity on the volumetric permeate flux and the rejection of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in a 15 kDa ceramic ultrafiltration membrane are evaluated. The decrease of pH produces a drop in the elimination of DOC, despite humic acid accumulation in the surface of membrane. Membrane has a lower humic acid flux resistance when pH decreases due to molecular compression of humic acid. Ionic strength has a relevant influence in humic substances processed with ceramic ultrafiltration membranes. A significant permeate flux reduction is approached when ionic strength increases as well as DOC removal reduction. Regarding the ionic strength rise, it can be observed that the resistance of the cake layer falls as in the case of falling pH. On the other hand, permeate flux rises due to the reduction of the effective size of the molecule. Concerning flow velocity, permeate flux reduction plays a significant role in contrast to DOC removal. Low flow velocity allows cake layer formation that considerably reduces flux permeate. Experiments carried out at neutral pH and low ionic strength, to analyse flow velocity, show no electro kinetic effects that influence the cake layer formation and flux permeate. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 331
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Beyer D, 1997, SURF INTERFACE ANAL, V25, P593
[2]   Comparison of various membrane types and module configurations in the treatment of natural water by means of low-pressure membrane methods [J].
Bodzek, M ;
Konieczny, K .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 14 (1-3) :69-78
[3]   Cross-flow filtration of guar gum solutions - Experimental results [J].
Carrere, H ;
Schaffer, A ;
Rene, F .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 14 (1-3) :59-67
[4]   Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes [J].
Childress, AE ;
Elimelech, M .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1996, 119 (02) :253-268
[5]   Effect of membrane pore size and solution chemistry on the ultrafiltration of humic substances solutions [J].
Costa, AR ;
de Pinho, MN .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2005, 255 (1-2) :49-56
[6]  
Fane AG, 1996, DESALINATION, V106, P1, DOI 10.1016/0011-9164(96)00085-9
[7]   MACROMOLECULAR STRUCTURES OF HUMIC SUBSTANCES [J].
GHOSH, K ;
SCHNITZER, M .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1980, 129 (05) :266-276
[8]   Nanofiltration of a German groundwater of high hardness and NOM content:: performance and costs [J].
Gorenflo, A ;
Velázquez-Padrón, D ;
Frimmel, FH .
DESALINATION, 2003, 151 (03) :253-265
[9]   Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes [J].
Hong, SK ;
Elimelech, M .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1997, 132 (02) :159-181
[10]   Ultrafiltration of protein and humic substances: effect of solution chemistry on fouling and flux decline [J].
Jones, KL ;
O'Melia, CR .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2001, 193 (02) :163-173