Mixed burden softening and melting phenomena in blast furnace operation Part 2 - Mechanism of softening and melting and impact on cohesive zone

被引:37
作者
Kaushik, P.
Fruehan, R. J.
机构
[1] Mittal Steel USA Res & Dev Ctr, E Chicago, IN 46312 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Ctr Iron & Steel Making Res Mat Sci & Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
blast furnace; softening; melting; pellets; DRI; HBI; lump ore; cohesive zone;
D O I
10.1179/174328106X118125
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
The present work was designed to improve the current understanding of the softening and melting (SM) mechanism of ferrous materials and to identify their potential impact on the cohesive zone in the blast furnace (BF). The lump ore, direct reduced iron (DRI) and hot briquetted iron (HBI) were individually subjected to industrial trials and their results were compared with those obtained in the laboratory (SM) tests described in first part of the present paper.(1) The difference between melting and 10% bed shrinkage temperature obtained from the results of laboratory and industrial tests was compared and it was found within 10% limits. The SM temperatures were also correlated to the basicity, gangue and flux contents of the mixed burden. The liquid slag mass fraction was computed using FactSage software and compared with the deformation of the burden bed. These results indicated presence of a small amount of liquid at temperatures close to the softening temperature of the burden suggesting that the deformation of solid phases is the primary cause for softening of the burden. The melting of the mixed burden is dependent on the melting point of DRI and melt exudation occurs close to the meltdown of the burden. The impact of ferrous burdens on the cohesive zone was predicted on the basis of experimental results which indicated DRI/HBI is an excellent blast furnace feed material to improve the productivity and decrease the coke rate in the BF.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 528
页数:9
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], IRONMAKING C P
[2]  
BAKKER T, 1999, THESIS DELFT U TECHN
[3]  
BORINDER T, 1987, SCAND J METALL, V16, P146
[4]  
BUSBY NJ, 1994, IRONMAK STEELMAK, V21, P229
[5]   Behavior of direct reduced iron and hot briquetted iron in the upper blast furnace shaft: Part I. Fundamentals of kinetics and mechanism of oxidation [J].
Kaushik, P. ;
Fruehan, R. J. .
METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS B-PROCESS METALLURGY AND MATERIALS PROCESSING SCIENCE, 2006, 37 (05) :715-725
[6]   Behavior of direct reduced iron and hot briquetted iron in the upper blast furnace shaft: part II. A model of oxidation [J].
Kaushik, P. ;
Fruehan, R. J. .
METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS B-PROCESS METALLURGY AND MATERIALS PROCESSING SCIENCE, 2006, 37 (05) :727-732
[7]   Mixed burden softening and melting phenomena in blast furnace operation Part 1 - X-ray observation of ferrous burden [J].
Kaushik, P. ;
Fruehan, R. J. .
IRONMAKING & STEELMAKING, 2006, 33 (06) :507-519
[8]  
NOGUEIRA PF, 2003, THESIS CARNEGIEMELLO
[9]   Subjects for achievement of blast furnace operation with low reducing agent rate [J].
Ujisawa, Y ;
Nakano, K ;
Matsukura, Y ;
Sunahara, K ;
Komatsu, S ;
Yamamoto, T .
ISIJ INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 45 (10) :1379-1385