Can government environmental auditing improve static and dynamic ecological efficiency in China?

被引:22
作者
Jiang, Qibo [1 ,2 ]
Tan, Qingmei [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, 29 Yu Dao St, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Audit Univ, Coll Econ, Nanjing 211815, Peoples R China
关键词
Government environmental auditing; Ecological efficiency; Environmental pollution control; External supervision; PRODUCTIVITY; LIFE;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-020-08578-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As an important part of external supervision, government environmental auditing plays a significant role in the construction of ecological civilization. With the execution of environmental audit events by the National Audit Office of China (CNAO) during 2008 to 2018, we examine the impact of government environmental auditing on ecological efficiency by using multiple regression method and PSM method. Our analyses show that government environmental auditing can obviously improve both static and dynamic ecological efficiency. Further research suggests that (1) government environmental auditing has a short-term improvement effect on ecological efficiency but nothing in the long run. (2) Government environmental auditing plays a supervisory and warning role in improving ecological efficiency. Those findings provide empirical evidence for the effects of government environmental auditing on ecological efficiency. The current study has some theoretical and practical implications for the government in terms of strengthening the external supervision of environmental protection and improving the ecological efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:21733 / 21746
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Aigner D., 1977, Journal of Econometrics, V6, P21, DOI [10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5, DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5]
  • [2] A PROCEDURE FOR RANKING EFFICIENT UNITS IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
    ANDERSEN, P
    PETERSEN, NC
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1993, 39 (10) : 1261 - 1265
  • [3] Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences
    Bertrand, M
    Mullainathan, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2003, 111 (05) : 1043 - 1075
  • [4] THE ECONOMIC-THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY
    CAVES, DW
    CHRISTENSEN, LR
    DIEWERT, WE
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1982, 50 (06) : 1393 - 1414
  • [5] MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS
    CHARNES, A
    COOPER, WW
    RHODES, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) : 429 - 444
  • [6] Chen XH, 2014, 2014 5TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND SERVICE SCIENCE (ICSESS), P32, DOI 10.1109/ICSESS.2014.6933508
  • [7] Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach
    Chung, YH
    Fare, R
    Grosskopf, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 51 (03) : 229 - 240
  • [8] FARE R, 1978, J ECON THEORY, V19, P150, DOI 10.1016/0022-0531(78)90060-1
  • [9] Fare R., 1996, Intertemporal production frontier: with dynamic DEA
  • [10] Fet A.M., 2003, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, V5, P232, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10098-003-0205-Z