Predictive factors of postoperative complications and hospital readmission after implementation of the single-port robotic platform: A single-center and single-surgeon experience

被引:1
作者
Lenfant, Louis [1 ,2 ]
Aminsharifi, Alireza [1 ,3 ]
Kim, Soodong [1 ]
Kaouk, Jihad [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Sorbonne Univ, Pitie Salpetriere Univ Hosp, AP HP, CRG 5,Predict Oncourol,Urol, Paris, France
[3] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Dept Urol, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
complication; readmission; risk factors; robotic; robotic surgery; single-port surgery;
D O I
10.1111/iju.14503
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To measure the incidence, and identify potential risk factors of conversion, postoperative complication and readmission for patients treated with urological robotic single-port surgery. Methods: All consecutive urological surgery procedures carried out with the single-port robotic platform by the same surgeon in a single institution between September 2018 and March 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. Demographic data, main perioperative outcomes and information related to the surgical technique were gathered and analyzed. A logistic regression model was used to assess predictive factors for any grade and high-grade (e.g. Clavien grade >= 3) postoperative complications, as well as predictive factors for readmission. Results: Analysis included 221 patients, of whom 194 (88%) underwent pelvic surgery and 27 (12.2%) underwent upper urinary tract surgery. Only one patient was converted to open surgery in the entire cohort. A total of 40 patients (18.1%) experienced postoperative complications, with grade >= 3 postoperative complications in 7.6% of the entire cohort. On multivariable analysis, the factors significantly associated with the risk of postoperative complication of any grade were diabetes (P < 0.001), perineal approach (P < 0.01) and postoperative pain management with opioids (P = 0.01). Only diabetes (P = 0.03) predicted a grade >= 3 complication. Overall, 17 patients (7.7%) were readmitted during the 3 months after surgery. A body mass index >30 kg/m(2) was the only identified predictor of readmission (P = 0.01). Conclusion: A wide range of pelvic, extraperitoneal and upper-tract urological procedures can be carried out using the robotic single-port platform with a minimal conversion rate and low complication or readmission rate.
引用
收藏
页码:530 / 537
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Initial Experience with da Vinci Single-port Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomies
    Agarwal, Deepak K.
    Sharma, Vidit
    Toussi, Amir
    Viers, Boyd R.
    Tollefson, Matthew K.
    Gettman, Matthew T.
    Frank, Igor
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 77 (03) : 373 - 379
  • [2] Safety Profile of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Standardized Report of Complications in 3317 Patients
    Agarwal, Piyush K.
    Sammon, Jesse
    Bhandari, Akshay
    Dabaja, Ali
    Diaz, Mireya
    Dusik-Fenton, Stacey
    Satyanarayana, Ramgopal
    Simone, Andrea
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Baize, Brad
    Menon, Mani
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (05) : 684 - 698
  • [3] Robotic Surgery Revives Radical Perineal Prostatectomy
    Akca, Oktay
    Zargar, Homayoun
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (02) : 340 - 341
  • [4] Urological Laparoendoscopic Single Site Surgery: Multi-Institutional Analysis of Risk Factors for Conversion and Postoperative Complications
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    Yakoubi, Rachid
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Stein, Robert J.
    White, Wesley M.
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Cindolo, Luca
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Volpe, Alessandro
    Han, Deok Hyun
    Derweesh, Ithaar H.
    Lee, Seung Wook
    Abdel-Karim, Aly M.
    Branco, Anibal
    Greco, Francesco
    Allaf, Mohamad
    Sotelo, Rene
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Best, Sara
    Bazzi, Wassim
    Pierorazio, Phillip
    Elsalmy, Salah
    Rane, Abhay
    Han, Woong Kyu
    Yang, Bo
    Schips, Luigi
    Molina, Wilson R.
    Fornara, Paolo
    Terrone, Carlo
    Giedelman, Camilo
    Lee, Joo Yong
    Crouzet, Sebastien
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Richstone, Lee
    Sun Yinghao
    Kim, Fernando J.
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (06) : 1989 - 1994
  • [5] Novel System for Robotic Single-port Surgery: Feasibility and State of the Art in Urology
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Garisto, Juan
    Gettman, Matthew
    Kaouk, Jihad
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2018, 4 (05): : 669 - 673
  • [6] Intraoperative Adverse Incident Classification (EAUiaiC) by the European Association of Urology ad hoc Complications Guidelines Panel
    Biyani, Chandra Shekhar
    Pecanka, Jakub
    Roupret, Morgan
    Jensen, Jorgen Bjerggaard
    Mitropoulos, Dionysios
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 77 (05) : 601 - 610
  • [7] Single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and pooled analysis of the preliminary experiences
    Checcucci, Enrico
    De Cillis, Sabrina
    Pecoraro, Angela
    Peretti, Dario
    Volpi, Gabriele
    Amparore, Daniele
    Piramide, Federico
    Piana, Alberto
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Fiori, Cristian
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 (01) : 55 - 64
  • [8] Early Complication Rates in a Single-Surgeon Series of 2500 Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomies: Report Applying a Standardized Grading System
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Palmer, Kenneth J.
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Moniz, Ravendra R.
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Orvieto, Marcelo A.
    Coughlin, Geoff
    Patel, Vipul R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (06) : 945 - 952
  • [9] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the setting of previous abdominal surgery: Perioperative results, oncological and functional outcomes, and complications in a single surgeon's series
    Di Pierro, Giovanni Battista
    Grande, Pietro
    Mordasini, Livio
    Danuser, Hansjorg
    Mattei, Agostino
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 36 : 170 - 176
  • [10] Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
    Dindo, D
    Demartines, N
    Clavien, PA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) : 205 - 213