Development and validation of a patient satisfaction scale for musculoskeletal care

被引:0
作者
Solomon, DH
Bates, DW
Horsky, J
Burdick, E
Schaffer, JL
Katz, JN
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med,Div Rheumatol Immunol & Allergy, Robert B Brigham Multipurpose Arthrit & Musculosk, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Med,Div Gen Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
ARTHRITIS CARE AND RESEARCH | 1999年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
patient satisfaction; musculoskeletal care; rheumatology; validity; reliability;
D O I
10.1002/1529-0131(199904)12:2<96::AID-ART4>3.0.CO;2-P
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To test the hypothesis that 3 distinct domains of patient satisfaction with musculoskeletal care-satisfaction with the office environment, provider-patient interaction, and treatment outcomes-can be measured reliably and, when considered separately are more valid indicators of satisfaction than global measures. Methods. Three hundred ninety-nine outpatients who presented with knee or shoulder pain rt ere enrolled in a prospective cohort study, We measured patient satisfaction with musculoskeletal care by adapting a widely used generic satisfaction survey. Results, Each domain of the scale was internally consistent, with Cronbach's alphas for satisfaction with the office environment, provider-patient interaction, and treatment outcome subscales of 0.68, 0.95, and 0.93, respectively. Validity correlations demonstrated the greater specificity of the subscales than global measures for particular aspects of musculoskeletal care. Conclusions. The musculoskeletal-specific satisfaction scale has excellent reliability and good discriminant validity. From a policy perspective, the distinct subscale structure is critical because problems within each domain may hare different remedies.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 100
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   The development and application of a patient satisfaction measurement system for hospital-wide quality improvement [J].
Arnetz, JE ;
Arnetz, BB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1996, 8 (06) :555-566
[2]  
BELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833
[3]  
Carlberg Anders, 1993, Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, V11, P105, DOI 10.3109/02813439308994911
[4]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[5]  
Davies A. R., 1991, GHAA's consumer satisfaction survey and user's manual, V2nd ed.
[6]  
DAVIES AR, 1988, GHAAS CONSUMER SATIS
[7]  
DONBEDIAN A, 1985, EXPLORATIONS QUALITY, V3
[8]   META-ANALYSIS OF SATISFACTION WITH MEDICAL-CARE - DESCRIPTION OF RESEARCH DOMAIN AND ANALYSIS OF OVERALL SATISFACTION LEVELS [J].
HALL, JA ;
DORNAN, MC .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1988, 27 (06) :637-644
[9]  
Halpern J, 1996, MED CARE, V34, pMS55
[10]  
Kleinbaum D.G., 1988, STUDENTS PARTIAL SOL