Correlation of Histologic Grade With Other Clinicopathological Parameters, Intrinsic Subtype, and Patients' Clinical Outcome in Taiwanese Women

被引:14
作者
Chen, Shou-Tung [1 ,2 ]
Lai, Hung-Wen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Tseng, Hsin-Shun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Li-Sheng [5 ,6 ]
Kuo, Shou-Jen [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Chen, Dar-Ren [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Changhua Christian Hosp, Comprehens Breast Canc Ctr, Changhua 500, Taiwan
[2] Changhua Christian Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Gen Surg, Changhua 500, Taiwan
[3] Changhua Christian Hosp, Dept Med Res, Changhua 500, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Inst Pharmacol, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Ctr Biostat Consultat, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
[6] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Oral Med, Sch Oral Hyg, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Chung Shan Med Univ, Sch Med, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
breast cancer; histologic grade; HER-2; estrogen receptor; progesterone receptor; NEGATIVE BREAST-CANCER; PATHOLOGICAL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS; GENE-EXPRESSION PATTERNS; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; TUMOR GRADE; MOLECULAR PORTRAITS; CARCINOMA; AMPLIFICATION; AGREEMENT; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1093/jjco/hyr157
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to reveal the relationships between histologic grade and other clinicopathologic parameters including intrinsic subtype in Taiwanese women with breast cancer. Methods: There were 1302 women diagnosed with breast cancer recruited for this study. Histologic grade was scored according to the Nottingham-modified Bloom-Richardson grading system. Results: Higher tumor grade was associated with larger tumor size (P = 0.021), a larger number of lymph node metastases (P = 0.001), advanced clinical stage (P = 0.010), higher human epithelial growth receptor-2 positivity (P < 0.001), negative estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor (P < 0.0001) status. Triple negative breast cancer (56.6%) and human epithelial growth receptor-2 (44.3%) subtypes were associated with more Grade III breast cancer in contrast to luminal A (22.3%) and B (29.9%) breast cancer. In multivariate Cox regression analysis for cancer-specific survival, histologic grade (hazard ratio 1.78) was a significant prognostic factor. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that histologic grade is highly correlated with some valuable biomarkers and confirmed the significance of histologic grade in Taiwanese female breast cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:1327 / 1335
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND PROGNOSIS IN BREAST CANCER - A STUDY OF 1409 CASES OF WHICH 359 HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED FOR 15 YEARS [J].
BLOOM, HJG ;
RICHARDSON, WW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1957, 11 (03) :359-&
[2]   Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value then triple-negative phenotype [J].
Cheang, Maggie C. U. ;
Voduc, David ;
Bajdik, Chris ;
Leung, Samuel ;
McKinney, Steven ;
Chia, Stephen K. ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 14 (05) :1368-1376
[3]   Prognostic and predictive factors in early-stage breast cancer [J].
Cianfrocca, M ;
Goldstein, LJ .
ONCOLOGIST, 2004, 9 (06) :606-616
[4]   TUMOR GRADE AS A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR IN PRIMARY BREAST-CANCER [J].
CONTESSO, G ;
JOTTI, GS ;
BONADONNA, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 25 (03) :403-409
[5]   THE IMPORTANCE OF HISTOLOGIC GRADE IN LONG-TERM PROGNOSIS OF BREAST-CANCER - A STUDY OF 1,010 PATIENTS, UNIFORMLY TREATED AT THE INSTITUT-GUSTAVE-ROUSSY [J].
CONTESSO, G ;
MOURIESSE, H ;
FRIEDMAN, S ;
GENIN, J ;
SARRAZIN, D ;
ROUESSE, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1987, 5 (09) :1378-1386
[6]   Histologic grading of breast cancer: Linkage of patient outcome with level of pathologist agreement [J].
Dalton, LW ;
Pinder, SE ;
Elston, CE ;
Ellis, IO ;
Page, DL ;
Dupont, WD ;
Blamey, RW .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2000, 13 (07) :730-735
[7]  
DAVIS BW, 1986, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V58, P2662, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19861215)58:12<2662::AID-CNCR2820581219>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-Y
[9]  
De Wolf C., 1996, European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening, V2nd
[10]  
ELLIS IO, 2005, CANC SCREENING PROGR