Modeling Subsurface Performance of a Geothermal Reservoir Using Machine Learning

被引:19
作者
Duplyakin, Dmitry [1 ]
Beckers, Koenraad F. [1 ]
Siler, Drew L. [2 ]
Martin, Michael J. [1 ]
Johnston, Henry E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Moffett Field, CA 94035 USA
关键词
geothermal reservoir modeling; machine learning; energy predictions; geothermal reservoir management;
D O I
10.3390/en15030967
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Geothermal power plants typically show decreasing heat and power production rates over time. Mitigation strategies include optimizing the management of existing wells-increasing or decreasing the fluid flow rates across the wells-and drilling new wells at appropriate locations. The latter is expensive, time-consuming, and subject to many engineering constraints, but the former is a viable mechanism for periodic adjustment of the available fluid allocations. In this study, we describe a new approach combining reservoir modeling and machine learning to produce models that enable such a strategy. Our computational approach allows us, first, to translate sets of potential flow rates for the active wells into reservoir-wide estimates of produced energy, and second, to find optimal flow allocations among the studied sets. In our computational experiments, we utilize collections of simulations for a specific reservoir (which capture subsurface characterization and realize history matching) along with machine learning models that predict temperature and pressure timeseries for production wells. We evaluate this approach using an "open-source" reservoir we have constructed that captures many of the characteristics of Brady Hot Springs, a commercially operational geothermal field in Nevada, USA. Selected results from a reservoir model of Brady Hot Springs itself are presented to show successful application to an existing system. In both cases, energy predictions prove to be highly accurate: all observed prediction errors do not exceed 3.68% for temperatures and 4.75% for pressures. In a cumulative energy estimation, we observe prediction errors that are less than 4.04%. A typical reservoir simulation for Brady Hot Springs completes in approximately 4 h, whereas our machine learning models yield accurate 20-year predictions for temperatures, pressures, and produced energy in 0.9 s. This paper aims to demonstrate how the models and techniques from our study can be applied to achieve rapid exploration of controlled parameters and optimization of other geothermal reservoirs.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Abadi M., 2015, ARXIV 2015 160304467
[2]  
Ahmmed B., 2020, P GEOTHERMAL RESOURC
[3]  
American Physical Society, 2021, MACHINE LEARNING PHY, DOI [10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.070001, DOI 10.1103/PHYSREVFLUIDS.6.070001]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, DOE GEOVISION HARNES
[5]   Deep Reinforcement Learning A brief survey [J].
Arulkumaran, Kai ;
Deisenroth, Marc Peter ;
Brundage, Miles ;
Bharath, Anil Anthony .
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2017, 34 (06) :26-38
[6]   A Review of Geothermal Technologies and Their Role in Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the USA [J].
Ball, Philip J. .
JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2021, 143 (01)
[7]   Macro Energy Trends and the Future of Geothermal Within the Low-Carbon Energy Portfolio [J].
Ball, Philip J. .
JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2021, 143 (01)
[8]  
Beckers K.F., 2021, P 46 WORKSHOP GEOTHE
[9]  
Brownlee J., 2018, STAT METHODS MACHINE
[10]   A New Modeling Framework for Geothermal Operational Optimization with Machine Learning (GOOML) [J].
Buster, Grant ;
Siratovich, Paul ;
Taverna, Nicole ;
Rossol, Michael ;
Weers, Jon ;
Blair, Andrea ;
Huggins, Jay ;
Siega, Christine ;
Mannington, Warren ;
Urgel, Alex ;
Cen, Jonathan ;
Quinao, Jaime ;
Watt, Robbie ;
Akerley, John .
ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (20)