Operationalizing Healthcare Simulation Psychological Safety A Descriptive Analysis of an Intervention

被引:28
作者
Henricksen, Jared W. [1 ]
Altenburg, Catherine [2 ]
Reeder, Ron W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Div Crit Care, 295 Chipeta Way,POB 581289, Salt Lake City, UT 84158 USA
[2] Intermt Healthcare, Primary Childrens Hosp, Simulat Program, Salt Lake City, UT USA
来源
SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 05期
关键词
Psychological safety; psychological distress; healthcare simulation; DISTRESS; OPPORTUNITIES; PERFORMANCE; EDUCATION; STUDENTS; STRESS; WORK;
D O I
10.1097/SIH.0000000000000253
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Despite efforts to prepare a psychologically safe environment, simulation participants are occasionally psychologically distressed. Instructing simulation educators about participant psychological risks and having a participant psychological distress action plan available to simulation educators may assist them as they seek to keep all participants psychologically safe. Methods: A Simulation Participant Psychological Safety Algorithm was designed to aid simulation educators as they debrief simulation participants perceived to have psychological distress and categorize these events as mild (level 1), moderate (level 2), or severe (level 3). A prebrief dedicated to creating a psychologically safe learning environment was held constant. The algorithm was used for 18 months in an active pediatric simulation program. Data collected included level of participant psychological distress as perceived and categorized by the simulation team using the algorithm, type of simulation that participants went through, who debriefed, and timing of when psychological distress was perceived to occur during the simulation session. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to evaluate the relationship between events and simulation type, events and simulation educator team who debriefed, and timing of event during the simulation session. Results: A total of 3900 participants went through 399 simulation sessions between August 1, 2014, and January 26, 2016. Thirty-four (<1%) simulation participants from 27 sessions (7%) were perceived to have an event. One participant was perceived to have a severe (level 3) psychological distress event. Events occurred more commonly in high-intensity simulations, with novice learners and with specific educator teams. Simulation type and simulation educator team were associated with occurrence of events (P < 0.001). There was no association between event timing and event level. Conclusions: Severe psychological distress as categorized by simulation personnel using the Simulation Participant Psychological Safety Algorithmis rare, with mild and moderate events being more common. The algorithm was used to teach simulation educators how to assist a participant who may be psychologically distressed and document perceived event severity.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 297
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Air Mary Elizabeth, 2013, J Dance Med Sci, V17, P115
  • [2] Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance
    Baer, M
    Frese, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2003, 24 (01) : 45 - 68
  • [3] Calhoun Aaron William, 2014, Perm J, V18, P14, DOI 10.7812/TPP/13-124
  • [4] Examining Pediatric Resuscitation Education Using Simulation and Scripted Debriefing A Multicenter Randomized Trial
    Cheng, Adam
    Hunt, Elizabeth A.
    Donoghue, Aaron
    Nelson-McMillan, Kristen
    Nishisaki, Akira
    LeFlore, Judy
    Eppich, Walter
    Moyer, Mike
    Brett-Fleegler, Marisa
    Kleinman, Monica
    Anderson, JoDee
    Adler, Mark
    Braga, Matthew
    Kost, Susanne
    Stryjewski, Glenn
    Min, Steve
    Podraza, John
    Lopreiato, Joseph
    Hamilton, Melinda Fiedor
    Stone, Kimberly
    Reid, Jennifer
    Hopkins, Jeffrey
    Manos, Jennifer
    Duff, Jonathan
    Richard, Matthew
    Nadkarni, Vinay M.
    [J]. JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2013, 167 (06) : 528 - 536
  • [5] THE BRIEF SYMPTOM INVENTORY - AN INTRODUCTORY REPORT
    DEROGATIS, LR
    MELISARATOS, N
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1983, 13 (03) : 595 - 605
  • [6] Simulation and psychology: creating, recognizing and using learning opportunities
    Dieckmann, Peter
    Krage, Ralf
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 26 (06) : 714 - 720
  • [7] The art and science of debriefing in simulation: Ideal and practice
    Dieckmann, Peter
    Friis, Susanne Molin
    Lippert, Anne
    Ostergaard, Doris
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2009, 31 (07) : E287 - E294
  • [8] Dismukes R Key, 2006, Simul Healthc, V1, P23
  • [9] Learning from failure in health care: frequent opportunities, pervasive barriers
    Edmondson, AC
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 13 : 3 - 9
  • [10] Psychological Safety: The History, Renaissance, and Future of an Interpersonal Construct
    Edmondson, Amy C.
    Lei, Zhike
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 1, 2014, 1 : 23 - 43