The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension

被引:193
作者
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Beckman Inst, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
REFERENCE RESOLUTION; EYE-MOVEMENTS; MIND; CONVERSATION; INFORMATION; DOMAINS;
D O I
10.3758/PBR.16.5.893
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
During conversation, interlocutors build on the set of shared beliefs known as common ground. Although there is general agreement that interlocutors maintain representations of common ground, there is no consensus regarding whether common-ground representations constrain initial language interpretation processes. Here, I propose that executive functioning-specifically, failures in inhibition control-can account for some occasional insensitivities to common-ground information. The present article presents the results of an experiment that demonstrates that individual differences in inhibition control determine the degree to which addressees successfully inhibit perspective-inappropriate interpretations of temporary referential ambiguities in their partner's speech. Whether mentioned information was grounded or not also played a role, suggesting that addressees may show sensitivity to common ground only when it is established collaboratively. The results suggest that, in conversation, perspective information routinely guides online language processing and that occasional insensitivities to perspective can be attributed partly to difficulties in inhibiting perspective-inappropriate interpretations.
引用
收藏
页码:893 / 900
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking [J].
Arnold, JE ;
Eisenband, JG ;
Brown-Schmidt, S ;
Trueswell, JC .
COGNITION, 2000, 76 (01) :B13-B26
[2]   Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground [J].
Barr, Dale J. .
COGNITION, 2008, 109 (01) :18-40
[3]   Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation [J].
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah ;
Gunlogson, Christine ;
Tanenhaus, Michael K. .
COGNITION, 2008, 107 (03) :1122-1134
[4]   Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's theory of mind [J].
Carlson, SM ;
Moses, LJ .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 72 (04) :1032-1053
[5]  
CLARK HH, 1991, PERSPECTIVES ON SOCIALLY SHARED COGNITION, P127, DOI 10.1037/10096-006
[6]  
CLARK HH, 1998, ELEMENTS DISCOURSE U, P10
[7]   EYE-MOVEMENTS AS A WINDOW INTO REAL-TIME SPOKEN LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION IN NATURAL CONTEXTS [J].
EBERHARD, KM ;
SPIVEYKNOWLTON, MJ ;
SEDIVY, JC ;
TANENHAUS, MK .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 1995, 24 (06) :409-436
[8]   Predicting cognitive control from preschool to late adolescence and young adulthood [J].
Eigsti, Inge-Marie ;
Zayas, Vivian ;
Mischel, Walter ;
Shoda, Yuichi ;
Ayduk, Ozlem ;
Dadlani, Mamta B. ;
Davidson, Matthew C. ;
Aber, J. Lawrence ;
Casey, B. J. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (06) :478-484
[9]   Processing demands in belief-desire reasoning: inhibition or general difficulty? [J].
Friedman, O ;
Leslie, AM .
DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2005, 8 (03) :218-225
[10]   Group differences in suppression skill [J].
Gernsbacher, MA .
AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 1997, 4 (03) :175-184