Frequency of percutaneous coronary interventions at facilities without on-site cardiac surgical backup - A report from the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR)

被引:26
作者
Dehmer, Gregory J. [1 ]
Kutcher, Michael A.
Dey, Syamal K.
Shaw, Richard E.
Weintraub, William S.
Mitchell, Kristi
Brindis, Ralph G.
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Coll Med, Temple, TX 76508 USA
[2] Scott & White Mem Hosp & Clin, Div Cardiol, Temple, TX USA
[3] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
[4] ACC, NCDR, Bethesda, MD USA
[5] Sutter Pacific Heart Ctr, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] No Calif Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, CA USA
[7] Christina Care Hlth Syst, Newark, DE USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.08.033
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The practice of performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in centers without on-site cardiac surgical backup is controversial. Using data from facilities that participated in the American College of Cardiology/National Cardiovascular Data Registry, the incidence of PCI without on-site surgical backup was evaluated. From January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2004, 39 of 449 (8.7%) centers were identified as sites that performed PCI without on-site surgical backup. By the end of 2005, 75 of 463 (16%) participating facilities were performing PCI without on-site backup. By using standardized data element definitions, it was possible to differentiate between patients who underwent elective PCI and those who had urgent nonelective PCI for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. This analysis showed that the number of elective and nonelective PCI procedures with or without on-site surgical backup per quarter had increased significantly (p < 0.0001) from 2001 to 2004. The number of PCI procedures performed without on-site surgical backup continued to increase in 2005. In conclusion, the significant increase in elective PCIs performed at facilities without on-site surgical backup occurred despite national guidelines that state elective PCI should not be done in centers without on-site cardiac surgery. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 332
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients [J].
Boersma, E .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (07) :779-788
[2]   Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction - Every minute of delay counts [J].
De Luca, G ;
Suryapranata, H ;
Ottervanger, JP ;
Antman, EM .
CIRCULATION, 2004, 109 (10) :1223-1225
[3]   Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials [J].
Keeley, EC ;
Boura, JA ;
Grines, CL .
LANCET, 2003, 361 (9351) :13-20
[4]   Times to treatment in transfer patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States - National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI)-3/4 analysis [J].
Nallamothu, BK ;
Bates, ER ;
Herrin, J ;
Wang, YF ;
Bradley, EH ;
Krumholz, HM .
CIRCULATION, 2005, 111 (06) :761-767
[5]   Outcomes following elective percutaneous coronary intervention without on-site surgical backup in a community hospital [J].
Paraschos, A ;
Callwood, D ;
Wightman, MB ;
Tcheng, JE ;
Phillips, HR ;
Stiles, GL ;
Daniel, JM ;
Sketch, MH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 95 (09) :1091-1093
[6]   MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE CORONARY-OCCLUSION DURING PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY - EXPERIENCE OF COMPLICATIONS IN A HOSPITAL WITHOUT ON SITE FACILITIES FOR CARDIAC-SURGERY [J].
RICHARDSON, SG ;
MORTON, P ;
MURTAGH, JG ;
OKEEFFE, DB ;
MURPHY, P ;
SCOTT, ME .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 300 (6721) :355-358
[7]   Comparability of quality-of-care indicators for emergency coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction regardless of on-site cardiac surgery (report from the national registry of myocardial infarction) [J].
Sanborn, TA ;
Jacobs, AK ;
Frederick, PD ;
Every, NR ;
French, WJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 93 (11) :1335-1339
[8]   Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era [J].
Seshadri, N ;
Whitlow, PL ;
Acharya, N ;
Houghtaling, P ;
Blackstone, EH ;
Ellis, SG .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (18) :2346-2350
[9]   Trends in cardiac catheterization laboratories in the United States [J].
Sheldon, WC .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2001, 53 (01) :40-45
[10]   ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention - Summary article - A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to update the 2001 guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention) [J].
Smith, SC ;
Feldman, TE ;
Hirshfeld, JW ;
Jacobs, AK ;
Kern, MJ ;
King, SB ;
Morrison, DA ;
O'Neill, WW ;
Schaff, HV ;
Whitlow, PL ;
Williams, DO .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (01) :216-235