The effect of maximum bite force on marginal bone loss of mini-implants supporting a mandibular overdenture: a randomized controlled trial

被引:65
作者
Jofre, J. [1 ]
Hamada, T. [2 ]
Nishimura, M. [3 ]
Klattenhoff, C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Concepcion, CRAI, Ctr Adv Prosthodont & Implantol, Sch Dent, Concepcion, Chile
[2] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Dent, Sendai, Miyagi 980, Japan
[3] Hiroshima Univ Hosp, Hiroshima, Japan
[4] Santo Tomas Univ, Concepcion, Chile
关键词
marginal bone loss; maximum bite force; mini-implants; overdentures; UNSPLINTED ORAL IMPLANTS; RETAINED OVERDENTURES; CLINICAL-TRIAL; RETENTION CHARACTERISTICS; INTERIMPLANT DISTANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; ANTERIOR MAXILLA; ATTACHMENT TYPE; ITI IMPLANTS; BAR;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01834.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the effect of maximum bite force (mBF) on marginal bone loss (MBL) around mini-implants in edentulous patients wearing mandibular overdentures with two retention systems: ball and bar. Material and methods Forty-five totally edentulous patients were selected from a public health center. All of them received two mini-implants (1.8 x 15 mm; Sendax (R)) in the anterior mandible using a minimally invasive technique. A single randomization was performed to allocate the patients in two groups. Group I (n=22) received two single ball-type mini-implants and Group II (n=23) received two mini-implants splinted with a prefabricated bar. The mBF was recorded using a press-sensitive sheet Dental Prescale (R) (Fuji) and MBL using standardized radiographs of each mini-implant at the baseline and 5, 7, 10, and 15 months after surgery; the values were compared between groups. Results Two members of Group I failed to complete the study, decreasing the number of participants to 20. There was no relationship between the mBF and the MBL of the mini-implants (Spearman's r(s)=0.147; P=0.378). At the 15-month follow-up, the average mBF for Group I (ball) was 247.53 +/- 132.91 N and that of Group II (bar) only 203.23 +/- 76.85 N (Mann-Whitney test; P=0.586). The MBL values were also higher for Group I (1.40 +/- 1.02 mm) than Group II (0.84 +/- 0.66 mm) during the entire 15-month follow-up period (Mann-Whitney test; P=0.077). Conclusions No relationship was found between mBF and MBL for patients wearing overdentures retained on mini-implants using bar or ball attachment systems. To cite this article:Jofre J, Hamada T, Nishimura M, Klattenhoff C. The effect of maximum bite force on marginal bone loss of mini-implants supporting a mandibular overdenture: a randomized controlled trial.Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 243-249.doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01834.x.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 249
页数:7
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection - An experimental study in dogs [J].
Abrahamsson, I ;
Berglundh, T ;
Lindhe, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 24 (08) :568-572
[2]   A 15-YEAR STUDY OF OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS IN THE TREATMENT OF THE EDENTULOUS JAW [J].
ADELL, R ;
LEKHOLM, U ;
ROCKLER, B ;
BRANEMARK, PI .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL SURGERY, 1981, 10 (06) :387-416
[3]  
Albrektsson T, 1986, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V1, P11
[4]  
ALBREKTSSON T, 1990, International Journal of Prosthodontics, V3, P30
[5]   Immediate loading of single-tooth ITI implants in the anterior maxilla:: a prospective 5-year pilot study [J].
Andersen, E ;
Haanæs, HR ;
Knutsen, BM .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2002, 13 (03) :281-287
[6]  
Bakke M, 2002, INT J PROSTHODONT, V15, P575
[7]   Mandibular overdentures supported by two Branemark, IMZ or ITI implants - A prospective comparative preliminary study: One-year results [J].
Batenburg, RHK ;
Meijer, HJA ;
Raghoebar, GM ;
Van Oort, RP ;
Boering, G .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1998, 9 (06) :374-383
[8]   Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosteal implants - A prospective, comparative study [J].
Batenburg, RHK ;
Raghoebar, GM ;
Van Oort, RP ;
Heijdenrijk, K ;
Boering, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 27 (06) :435-439
[9]  
Bulard R A, 2001, Dent Today, V20, P82
[10]  
Bulard Ronald A, 2005, Compend Contin Educ Dent, V26, P892