Red jungle fowl have more contrafreeloading than white leghorn layers:: Effect of food deprivation and consequences for information gain

被引:66
作者
Lindqvist, CES [1 ]
Schütz, KE [1 ]
Jensen, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Environm & Hlth, Sect Ethol, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1163/15685390260437335
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Contrafreeloading (CFL), i.e. choosing food which requires work over free food, occurs at a higher rate in red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) compared to White Leghorn layers. We examined whether this difference between breeds was altered by food deprivation and whether it affected the information gained about alternative food sources. In a first experiment, twenty birds of each breed were deprived for zero, three and six hours and then allowed a choice of feeding from freely available food or food mixed with wood shavings. In both breeds, CFL tended to decrease after deprivation, but jungle fowl consistently showed more CFL than Leghorns also after food deprivation. This shows that differences in CFL between breeds were not altered by food deprivation, and the larger CFL in jungle fowl may represent a genetically based difference in feeding strategy. In a second experiment, we examined whether the differences in CFL affected how the birds acquired information about alternative food sites of different quality. Twenty birds of each breed were allowed to forage during three 10 min sessions in a four armed maze, where symbols in each end of the arms indicated the location of four different quality food sources; 'high gain' (freely available food), 'medium gain' (70% food, 30% wood shavings), 'low gain' (30% food), and 'no gain' (100% wood shavings). Each bird was then tested in the same maze when the 'high gain' food source and its symbol had been removed, and the other three sources contained only the symbols and wood shavings. Jungle fowl chose the symbol indicating the best available food source significantly more often than the Leghorns. The results indicate that Leghorn gain less information during foraging, which may have consequences for their adaptation capacity in a production environment. This could either be a consequence of Leghorns showing less CFL, or a generally impaired learning capacity of Leghorns compared to jungle fowl.
引用
收藏
页码:1195 / 1209
页数:15
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Contrafreeloading in starlings: Testing the information hypothesis [J].
Bean, D ;
Mason, GJ ;
Bateson, M .
BEHAVIOUR, 1999, 136 :1267-1282
[2]   QUANTITATIVE GENETICS AND EVOLUTION - IS OUR UNDERSTANDING OF GENETICS SUFFICIENT TO EXPLAIN EVOLUTION [J].
BEILHARZ, RG ;
LUXFORD, BG ;
WILKINSON, JL .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR TIERZUCHTUNG UND ZUCHTUNGSBIOLOGIE, 1993, 110 (03) :161-170
[3]   Environmental limit to genetic change. An alternative theorem of natural selection [J].
Beilharz, RG .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR TIERZUCHTUNG UND ZUCHTUNGSBIOLOGIE, 1998, 115 (06) :433-437
[4]   BEHAVIORAL-DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LAYING HEN POPULATIONS SELECTED FOR HIGH AND LOW EFFICIENCY OF FOOD UTILIZATION [J].
BRAASTAD, BO ;
KATLE, J .
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 1989, 30 (03) :533-544
[6]   FREE AND OPERANT FEEDING IN DOMESTIC-FOWLS [J].
DUNCAN, IJH ;
HUGHES, BO .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1972, 20 (04) :775-777
[7]   The foraging behaviour of Mongolian gerbils: A behavioural need or a need to know? [J].
Forkman, B .
BEHAVIOUR, 1996, 133 :129-143
[8]  
FORKMAN B, 1991, BEHAVIOUR, V117, P242
[9]  
INGLIS IR, 1986, ANIM BEHAV, V34, P614, DOI 10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80136-1
[10]   Free food or earned food? A review and fuzzy model of contrafreeloading [J].
Inglis, IR ;
Forkman, B ;
Lazarus, J .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1997, 53 :1171-1191