Trust in Direct Leaders and Top Leaders: A Trickle-Up Model

被引:54
作者
Fulmer, C. Ashley [1 ,2 ]
Ostroff, Cheri [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Psychol, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Univ Iowa, Tippie Coll Business, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ South Australia, Sch Management, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
trust; leadership; trickle-up; performance; procedural justice; PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT; MEMBER EXCHANGE; INDIVIDUALISM-COLLECTIVISM; BEHAVIORAL INTEGRITY; ETHICAL LEADERSHIP; SOCIAL-EXCHANGE; PERFORMANCE; JUSTICE; TRUSTWORTHINESS; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1037/apl0000189
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Low levels of employee trust in top leaders pose challenges to organizations with respect to retention, performance, and profits. This research examines how trust in top leaders can be fostered through the relationships individuals have with their direct leaders. We propose a trickle-up model whereby trust in direct leaders exerts an upward influence on trust in top leaders. Drawing on the group value model, we predict that direct leaders' procedural justice serves as the key mechanism in facilitating the trickle-up process. Further, this process should be particularly strong for employees high on vertical collectivism, and the trickled-up trust in top leaders should exert a stronger impact on employees' overall performance in the organization than trust in direct leaders. Multiphase and multisource data from 336 individuals support these hypotheses. The findings advance our understanding of trust and leadership by highlighting that trust in leaders at different levels does not form independently and that trust in leaders trickles up across hierarchical levels.
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 657
页数:10
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]  
ABRAHAMSON E, 1994, ACAD MANAGE REV, V19, P728
[2]  
Aiken L.S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interaction
[3]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Mplus user's guide
[5]   Leader distance: a review and a proposed theory [J].
Antonakis, J ;
Atwater, L .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2002, 13 (06) :673-704
[6]   Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model [J].
Aryee, Samuel ;
Chen, Zhen Xiong ;
Sun, Li-Yun ;
Debrah, Yaw A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (01) :191-201
[7]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[8]   Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations [J].
Becker, TE .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2005, 8 (03) :274-289
[9]  
Berland Edelman, 2014, 2014 EDELMAN TRUST B
[10]  
Blau P. M., 1964, Journal of Social Forces, DOI [10.4324/9780203792643, DOI 10.4324/9780203792643]