Postoperative Pain Assessment With Three Intensity Scales in Chinese Elders

被引:48
|
作者
Li, Li [1 ]
Herr, Keela [2 ]
Chen, Pingyan [3 ]
机构
[1] So Med Univ, Dept Nursing, Zhujiang Hosp, Guangzhou 510282, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Nursing, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] So Med Univ, Dept Biostat, Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, Guangzhou 510282, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Postoperative pain; pain intensity; assessment; measurement; Faces Pain Scale Revised; numeric rating scale; pain thermometer; Chinese adults; elderly; OLDER SURGICAL-PATIENTS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; ADULTS; YOUNGER; IMPACT; MANAGEMENT; RELIABILITY; THERMOMETER; PREFERENCE; DEMENTIA;
D O I
10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01280.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R), the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and the Iowa Pain Thermometer (IPT) for pain assessment in Chinese elders who have had surgery. Design: A descriptive correlational design with repeated measures was used. A convenience sample of 180 Chinese elders (age range 65 to 95 years) undergoing scheduled Surgery at a university-affiliated hospital was recruited. Methods: On the day before Surgery, recalled pain and anticipated postoperative pain intensity were rated by patients with three scales presented ill randomized order, and then cognitive function was measured. oil the first 3 postoperative days, participants completed the three scales in random order to assess Current, worst, and least pain on cacti day. On the 3rd postoperative day, single retrospective ratings on worst, least, and average pain over the 3 days for each scale were also obtained and scale preferences were investigated. Findings: The failure rates for all three scales were extremely low. The intraclass correlation coefficients across Current, worst, and least pain on each postoperative day were consistently high (0.949 to 0.965), and all scales at each rating were strongly correlated (r=.833 to .962). Pain scores significantly decreased during the 3 postoperative days and all three scales were found to be sensitive in evaluating patient-control led analgesia (PCA) efficacy. The scale mostly preferred was the IPT (54.7%), followed by the FPS-R (28.5%) and the NRS (15.6%). No significant differences were noted in participant preference by age and cognitive status, but preference for the IPT and the FPS-R were significantly related to gender and education level. Conclusions: Although all three scales show good reliability, validity, and sensitivity for assessing postoperative pain intensity in Chinese elders, the IPT appears to be a better choice based on patient preference. Clinical Relevance: The FPS-R, the NRS, and the IPT can be used confidently to assess postoperative pain in Chinese surgical elders.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 249
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pain Assessment in Children Validity of Facial Expression Items in Observational Pain Scales
    Chang, Julie
    Versloot, Judith
    Fashler, Samantha R.
    McCrystal, Kalie N.
    Craig, Kenneth D.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2015, 31 (03) : 189 - 197
  • [42] Pain assessment and management in children in the postoperative period: A review of the most commonly used postoperative pain assessment tools, new diagnostic methods and the latest guidelines for postoperative pain therapy in children
    Zielinski, Jakub
    Morawska-Kochman, Monika
    Zatonski, Tomasz
    ADVANCES IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2020, 29 (03): : 365 - 374
  • [43] AN APP for the Assessment of Pain Intensity: Validity Properties and Agreement of Pain Reports When Used with Young People
    Sanchez-Rodriguez, Elisabet
    de la Vega, Rocio
    Castarlenas, Elena
    Roset, Roman
    Miro, Jordi
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2015, 16 (10) : 1982 - 1992
  • [44] Psychometric comparison of three behavioural scales for the assessment of pain in critically ill patients unable to self-report
    Chanques, Gerald
    Pohlman, Anne
    Kress, John P.
    Molinari, Nicolas
    de Jong, Audrey
    Jaber, Samir
    Hall, Jesse B.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 18 (05):
  • [45] Assessment of acute postoperative pain
    Diez-Alvarez, E.
    Arrospide, A.
    Mar, J.
    Cuesta, M.
    del Carmen Martinez, M.
    Beitia, E.
    Urrejola, J.
    REVISTA DE CALIDAD ASISTENCIAL, 2009, 24 (05) : 215 - 221
  • [46] Evaluation of Pain Intensity Assessment Tools Among Elderly Patients With Cancer in Taiwan
    Chang, Hsien-Chen
    Lai, Yeur-Hur
    Lin, Kuan-Chia
    Lee, Tzu-Ying
    Lin, Hung-Ru
    CANCER NURSING, 2017, 40 (04) : 269 - 275
  • [47] A Model-Based Approach for Joint Analysis of Pain Intensity and Opioid Consumption in Postoperative Pain
    Rasmus V Juul
    Katrine R Knøsgaard
    Anne E Olesen
    Katja V Pedersen
    Mads Kreilgaard
    Lona L Christrup
    Palle J Osther
    Asbjørn M Drewes
    Trine M Lund
    The AAPS Journal, 2016, 18 : 1013 - 1022
  • [48] Postoperative Pain Assessment after Pediatric Otolaryngologic Surgery
    Schnelle, Ariane
    Volk, Gerd Fabian
    Finkensieper, Mira
    Meissner, Winfried
    Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2013, 14 (11) : 1786 - 1796
  • [49] Reduced pain intensity at the first dressing improves postoperative pain control after anorectal surgery
    Li, Huixiang
    Gong, Hongpan
    Fang, Yuxiao
    Gong, Hanlin
    SIGNA VITAE, 2023, 19 (02) : 123 - 129
  • [50] A Model-Based Approach for Joint Analysis of Pain Intensity and Opioid Consumption in Postoperative Pain
    Juul, Rasmus V.
    Knosgaard, Katrine R.
    Olesen, Anne E.
    Pedersen, Katja V.
    Kreilgaard, Mads
    Christrup, Lona L.
    Osther, Palle J.
    Drewes, Asbjorn M.
    Lund, Trine M.
    AAPS JOURNAL, 2016, 18 (04): : 1013 - 1022