Postoperative Pain Assessment With Three Intensity Scales in Chinese Elders

被引:48
|
作者
Li, Li [1 ]
Herr, Keela [2 ]
Chen, Pingyan [3 ]
机构
[1] So Med Univ, Dept Nursing, Zhujiang Hosp, Guangzhou 510282, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Nursing, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] So Med Univ, Dept Biostat, Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, Guangzhou 510282, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Postoperative pain; pain intensity; assessment; measurement; Faces Pain Scale Revised; numeric rating scale; pain thermometer; Chinese adults; elderly; OLDER SURGICAL-PATIENTS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; ADULTS; YOUNGER; IMPACT; MANAGEMENT; RELIABILITY; THERMOMETER; PREFERENCE; DEMENTIA;
D O I
10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01280.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R), the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and the Iowa Pain Thermometer (IPT) for pain assessment in Chinese elders who have had surgery. Design: A descriptive correlational design with repeated measures was used. A convenience sample of 180 Chinese elders (age range 65 to 95 years) undergoing scheduled Surgery at a university-affiliated hospital was recruited. Methods: On the day before Surgery, recalled pain and anticipated postoperative pain intensity were rated by patients with three scales presented ill randomized order, and then cognitive function was measured. oil the first 3 postoperative days, participants completed the three scales in random order to assess Current, worst, and least pain on cacti day. On the 3rd postoperative day, single retrospective ratings on worst, least, and average pain over the 3 days for each scale were also obtained and scale preferences were investigated. Findings: The failure rates for all three scales were extremely low. The intraclass correlation coefficients across Current, worst, and least pain on each postoperative day were consistently high (0.949 to 0.965), and all scales at each rating were strongly correlated (r=.833 to .962). Pain scores significantly decreased during the 3 postoperative days and all three scales were found to be sensitive in evaluating patient-control led analgesia (PCA) efficacy. The scale mostly preferred was the IPT (54.7%), followed by the FPS-R (28.5%) and the NRS (15.6%). No significant differences were noted in participant preference by age and cognitive status, but preference for the IPT and the FPS-R were significantly related to gender and education level. Conclusions: Although all three scales show good reliability, validity, and sensitivity for assessing postoperative pain intensity in Chinese elders, the IPT appears to be a better choice based on patient preference. Clinical Relevance: The FPS-R, the NRS, and the IPT can be used confidently to assess postoperative pain in Chinese surgical elders.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 249
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Postoperative pain assessment after septorhinoplasty
    Wittekindt, D.
    Wittekindt, C.
    Schneider, G.
    Meissner, W.
    Guntinas-Lichius, O.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 269 (06) : 1613 - 1621
  • [32] Correspondence of Verbal Descriptor and Numeric Rating Scales for Pain Intensity: An Item Response Theory Calibration
    Edelen, Maria Orlando
    Saliba, Debra
    JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 65 (07): : 778 - 785
  • [33] Utilizing pain assessment scales increases the frequency of diagnosing pain among elderly nursing home residents
    Kamel, HK
    Phlavan, M
    Malekgoudarzi, B
    Gogel, P
    Morley, JE
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2001, 21 (06) : 450 - 455
  • [34] The use of multiple-item scales for pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients
    Jensen, MP
    Turner, LR
    Turner, JA
    Romano, JM
    PAIN, 1996, 67 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [35] Evaluation of two observational pain assessment scales during the anaesthesia recovery period in Chinese surgical older adults
    Guo, Li-Li
    Li, Li
    Liu, Yao-Wei
    Herr, Keela
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2015, 24 (1-2) : 212 - 221
  • [36] Validity of four pain intensity rating scales
    Ferreira-Valente, Maria Alexandra
    Pais-Ribeiro, Jose Luis
    Jensen, Mark P.
    PAIN, 2011, 152 (10) : 2399 - 2404
  • [37] The Postoperative Pain Assessment Skills pilot trial
    McGillion, Michael
    Dubrowski, Adam
    Stremler, Robyn
    Watt-Watson, Judy
    Campbell, Fiona
    McCartney, Colin
    Victor, J. Charles
    Wiseman, Jeffrey
    Snell, Linda
    Costello, Judy
    Robb, Anja
    Nelson, Sioban
    Stinson, Jennifer
    Hunter, Judith
    Dao, Thuan
    Promislow, Sara
    McNaughton, Nancy
    White, Scott
    Shobbrook, Cindy
    Jeffs, Lianne
    Mauch, Kianda
    Leegaard, Marit
    Beattie, W. Scott
    Schreiber, Martin
    Silver, Ivan
    PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2011, 16 (06) : 433 - 439
  • [38] Comparison of Pain Scale Preferences and Pain Intensity According to Pain Scales among Turkish Patients: A Descriptive Study
    Sayin, Yazile Yazici
    Akyolcu, Neriman
    PAIN MANAGEMENT NURSING, 2014, 15 (01) : 156 - 164
  • [39] Postoperative pain assessment using four behavioral scales in Pakistani children undergoing elective surgery
    Shamim, Faisal
    Ullah, Hameed
    Khan, Fauzia A.
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 9 (02) : 174 - 178
  • [40] Pain Assessment and Intensity in Hospitalized Children in Canada
    Stevens, Bonnie J.
    Harrison, Denise
    Rashotte, Judy
    Yamada, Janet
    Abbott, Laura K.
    Coburn, Geraldine
    Stinson, Jennifer
    Le May, Sylvie
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 13 (09) : 857 - 865