Postoperative Pain Assessment With Three Intensity Scales in Chinese Elders

被引:48
|
作者
Li, Li [1 ]
Herr, Keela [2 ]
Chen, Pingyan [3 ]
机构
[1] So Med Univ, Dept Nursing, Zhujiang Hosp, Guangzhou 510282, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Nursing, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] So Med Univ, Dept Biostat, Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, Guangzhou 510282, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Postoperative pain; pain intensity; assessment; measurement; Faces Pain Scale Revised; numeric rating scale; pain thermometer; Chinese adults; elderly; OLDER SURGICAL-PATIENTS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; ADULTS; YOUNGER; IMPACT; MANAGEMENT; RELIABILITY; THERMOMETER; PREFERENCE; DEMENTIA;
D O I
10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01280.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R), the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and the Iowa Pain Thermometer (IPT) for pain assessment in Chinese elders who have had surgery. Design: A descriptive correlational design with repeated measures was used. A convenience sample of 180 Chinese elders (age range 65 to 95 years) undergoing scheduled Surgery at a university-affiliated hospital was recruited. Methods: On the day before Surgery, recalled pain and anticipated postoperative pain intensity were rated by patients with three scales presented ill randomized order, and then cognitive function was measured. oil the first 3 postoperative days, participants completed the three scales in random order to assess Current, worst, and least pain on cacti day. On the 3rd postoperative day, single retrospective ratings on worst, least, and average pain over the 3 days for each scale were also obtained and scale preferences were investigated. Findings: The failure rates for all three scales were extremely low. The intraclass correlation coefficients across Current, worst, and least pain on each postoperative day were consistently high (0.949 to 0.965), and all scales at each rating were strongly correlated (r=.833 to .962). Pain scores significantly decreased during the 3 postoperative days and all three scales were found to be sensitive in evaluating patient-control led analgesia (PCA) efficacy. The scale mostly preferred was the IPT (54.7%), followed by the FPS-R (28.5%) and the NRS (15.6%). No significant differences were noted in participant preference by age and cognitive status, but preference for the IPT and the FPS-R were significantly related to gender and education level. Conclusions: Although all three scales show good reliability, validity, and sensitivity for assessing postoperative pain intensity in Chinese elders, the IPT appears to be a better choice based on patient preference. Clinical Relevance: The FPS-R, the NRS, and the IPT can be used confidently to assess postoperative pain in Chinese surgical elders.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 249
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Responsiveness of Verbal and Numerical Rating Scales to Measure Pain Intensity in Patients With Chronic Pain
    Chien, Chi-Wen
    Bagraith, Karl S.
    Khan, Asaduzzaman
    Deen, Michael
    Strong, Jenny
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2013, 14 (12) : 1653 - 1662
  • [22] Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of the Use of Pain Scales in Postoperative Pain Assessments
    Wikstrom, Lotta
    Eriksson, Kerstin
    Arestedt, Kristofer
    Fridlund, Bengt
    Brostrom, Anders
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2014, 27 (01) : 53 - 58
  • [23] On the electronic measurement of pain intensity: Can we use different pain intensity scales interchangeably?
    Sanchez-Rodriguez, Elisabet
    Castarlenas, Elena
    de la Vega, Rocio
    Roset, Roman
    Miro, Jordi
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 22 (13) : 1658 - 1667
  • [24] Assessment of pain during medical procedures: A comparison of three scales
    Jensen, MP
    Miller, L
    Fisher, LD
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1998, 14 (04) : 343 - 349
  • [25] Assessing the Association of Pain Intensity Scales on Quality of Life in Elderly Patients with Chronic Pain: A Nursing Approach
    Alodhialah, Abdulaziz M.
    Almutairi, Ashwaq A.
    Almutairi, Mohammed
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (20)
  • [26] Pain intensity scales: A cross-sectional study on the preferences and knowledge of physiotherapists and participants with musculoskeletal pain
    Ranzatto, Amanda Dutra da Silva
    Chaves, Thais Cristina
    Martins, Marcella Nobre
    Motta, Diogo Pereira
    Nogueira, Leandro Calazans
    Meziat-Filho, Ney
    Reis, Felipe J. J.
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2024, 73
  • [27] Where Are We: A Systematic Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of Pain Assessment Scales for Use in Chinese Children
    Bai, Jinbing
    Jiang, Nan
    PAIN MANAGEMENT NURSING, 2015, 16 (04) : 617 - 631
  • [28] PAIN INTENSITY SCALES COMPARISON IN PATIENT WITH ABDOMINAL PAIN
    Trninic, Zoran
    Spahalic, Manja
    Galic, Gordan
    Kozomara, Davorin
    Lasic, Valentina
    Bevanda, Danijel
    Sutalo, Nikica
    PSYCHIATRIA DANUBINA, 2017, 29 : 127 - 132
  • [29] Classification of pain intensity with the pain beliefs and perceptions inventory (PBPI) and the pain catastrophizing scales (PCS)
    Blanch, Angel
    Sole, Silvia
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (10) : 2853 - 2859
  • [30] A descriptive study of the use of visual analogue scales and verbal rating scales for the assessment of postoperative pain in orthopedic patients
    Briggs, M
    Closs, JS
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1999, 18 (06) : 438 - 446