Postoperative Pain Assessment With Three Intensity Scales in Chinese Elders

被引:48
|
作者
Li, Li [1 ]
Herr, Keela [2 ]
Chen, Pingyan [3 ]
机构
[1] So Med Univ, Dept Nursing, Zhujiang Hosp, Guangzhou 510282, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Nursing, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] So Med Univ, Dept Biostat, Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, Guangzhou 510282, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Postoperative pain; pain intensity; assessment; measurement; Faces Pain Scale Revised; numeric rating scale; pain thermometer; Chinese adults; elderly; OLDER SURGICAL-PATIENTS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; ADULTS; YOUNGER; IMPACT; MANAGEMENT; RELIABILITY; THERMOMETER; PREFERENCE; DEMENTIA;
D O I
10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01280.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R), the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and the Iowa Pain Thermometer (IPT) for pain assessment in Chinese elders who have had surgery. Design: A descriptive correlational design with repeated measures was used. A convenience sample of 180 Chinese elders (age range 65 to 95 years) undergoing scheduled Surgery at a university-affiliated hospital was recruited. Methods: On the day before Surgery, recalled pain and anticipated postoperative pain intensity were rated by patients with three scales presented ill randomized order, and then cognitive function was measured. oil the first 3 postoperative days, participants completed the three scales in random order to assess Current, worst, and least pain on cacti day. On the 3rd postoperative day, single retrospective ratings on worst, least, and average pain over the 3 days for each scale were also obtained and scale preferences were investigated. Findings: The failure rates for all three scales were extremely low. The intraclass correlation coefficients across Current, worst, and least pain on each postoperative day were consistently high (0.949 to 0.965), and all scales at each rating were strongly correlated (r=.833 to .962). Pain scores significantly decreased during the 3 postoperative days and all three scales were found to be sensitive in evaluating patient-control led analgesia (PCA) efficacy. The scale mostly preferred was the IPT (54.7%), followed by the FPS-R (28.5%) and the NRS (15.6%). No significant differences were noted in participant preference by age and cognitive status, but preference for the IPT and the FPS-R were significantly related to gender and education level. Conclusions: Although all three scales show good reliability, validity, and sensitivity for assessing postoperative pain intensity in Chinese elders, the IPT appears to be a better choice based on patient preference. Clinical Relevance: The FPS-R, the NRS, and the IPT can be used confidently to assess postoperative pain in Chinese surgical elders.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 249
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Postoperative pain intensity assessment: A comparison of four scales in Chinese adults
    Li, Li
    Liu, Xueqin
    Herr, Keela
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2007, 8 (03) : 223 - 234
  • [2] Comparison of three rating scales for assessing pain intensity in an intensive care unit
    Karahan, Azize
    Ersayin, Asuman
    Yildirim, Firides
    Abbasoglu, Aysel
    Akkuzu, Gulcihan
    Akyuz, Necibe
    TURK GOGUS KALP DAMAR CERRAHISI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 20 (01): : 50 - 55
  • [3] Measuring pain intensity in older patients: a comparison of five scales
    Nimmaanrat, Sasikaan
    Thepsuwan, Arpawan
    Tipchatyotin, Suttipong
    Jensen, Mark P.
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [4] Comparison of four different pain scales in the evaluation of postoperative acute pain intensity
    Gurkan, Aysel
    Aldemir, Kadriye
    Andsoy, Isil Isik
    Gul, Asiye
    CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 45 (04): : 1562 - 1571
  • [5] Evaluation of three pain assessment scales used for ventilated neonates
    Huang, Xiao-Zhi
    Li, Li
    Zhou, Jun
    He, Fang
    Zhong, Chun-Xia
    Wang, Bin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2018, 27 (19-20) : 3522 - 3529
  • [6] Psychometric properties of pain intensity scales comparing among postoperative adult patients, elderly patients without and with mild cognitive impairment in China
    Zhou, Yinghua
    Petpichetchian, Wongchan
    Kitrungrote, Luppana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2011, 48 (04) : 449 - 457
  • [7] Pain Intensity Assessment Scales for Dermatologic Surgery Patients: A Systematic Review
    Govas, Panayiota
    Ketchum, Andrea
    Kazi, Rashek
    Gordon, Beth R.
    Carroll, Bryan T.
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2022, 48 (02) : 232 - 238
  • [8] Comparison of three preverbal scales for postoperative pain assessment in a diverse pediatric sample
    Schade, JG
    Joyce, BA
    Gerkensmeyer, J
    Keck, JF
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1996, 12 (06) : 348 - 359
  • [9] Reliability and responsivity of pain intensity scales in individuals with chronic pain
    Euasobhon, Pramote
    Atisook, Raviwon
    Bumrungchatudom, Kulsiri
    Zinboonyahgoon, Nantthasorn
    Saisavoey, Nattha
    Jensen, Mark P. P.
    PAIN, 2022, 163 (12) : E1184 - E1191
  • [10] Evaluation of the Iowa Pain Thermometer and other selected pain intensity scales in younger and older adult cohorts using controlled clinical pain: A preliminary study
    Herr, Keela
    Spratt, Kevin F.
    Garand, Linda
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2007, 8 (07) : 585 - 600