The Brief Pain Inventory and Its "Pain At Its Worst in the Last 24 Hours" Item: Clinical Trial Endpoint Considerations

被引:158
作者
Atkinson, Thomas M. [1 ,2 ]
Mendoza, Tito R. [3 ]
Sit, Laura [1 ,4 ]
Passik, Steven [2 ]
Scher, Howard I. [4 ]
Cleeland, Charles [3 ]
Basch, Ethan [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Hlth Outcomes Res Grp, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Symptom Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
Pain Measurement; Patient Outcome Assessment; United States Food and Drug Administration; Drug Labeling; CANCER PAIN; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; INTERFERENCE MEASURES; OUTCOME MEASURES; ASSESSMENT-TOOL; HEALTH-STATUS; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; VERSION; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00774.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Context. In 2006, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a draft Guidance for Industry on the use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) Measures in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. This draft guidance outlines psychometric aspects that should be considered when designing a PRO measure, including conceptual framework, content validity, construct validity, reliability, and the ability to detect clinically meaningful score changes. When finalized, it may provide a blueprint for evaluations of PRO measures that can be considered by sponsors and investigators involved in PRO research and drug registration trials. Objective. In this review we examine the short form of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and particularly the "pain at its worst in the last 24 hours" item in the context of the FDA draft guidance, to assess its utility in clinical trials that include pain as a PRO endpoint. Results and Conclusions. After a systematic evaluation of the psychometric aspects of the BPI, we conclude that the BPI and its "pain at its worst in the last 24 hours" item generically satisfy most key recommendations outlined in the draft guidance for assessing a pain-reduction treatment effect. Nonetheless, when the BPI is being considered for assessment of pain endpoints in a registration trial, sponsors and investigators should consult with the appropriate FDA division early during research design to discuss whether there is sufficient precedent to use the instrument in the population of interest or whether additional evaluations of measurement properties are advisable.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 346
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, GUID IND PAT REP OUT
  • [2] Validation of the Spanish version of the Brief Pain Inventory in patients with oncological pain
    Badia, X
    Muriel, C
    Gracia, A
    Núñez-Olarte, JM
    Perulero, N
    Gálvez, R
    Carulla, J
    Cleeland, CS
    [J]. MEDICINA CLINICA, 2003, 120 (02): : 52 - 59
  • [3] Brown T. A., 2006, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
  • [4] A validation study of an Italian version of the brief pain inventory
    Caraceni, A
    Mendoza, TR
    Meencaglia, E
    Baratella, C
    Edwards, K
    Forjaz, MJ
    Martini, C
    Serlin, RC
    deConno, F
    Cleeland, CS
    [J]. PAIN, 1996, 65 (01) : 87 - 92
  • [5] What is a clinically meaningful change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire? Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study 5592
    Cella, D
    Eton, DT
    Fairclough, DL
    Bonomi, P
    Heyes, AE
    Silberman, C
    Wolf, MK
    Johnson, DH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 55 (03) : 285 - 295
  • [6] Estimating Clinically Meaningful Changes for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate: Results from a Clinical Trial of Patients with Metastatic Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer
    Cella, David
    Nichol, Michael B.
    Eton, David
    Nelson, Joel B.
    Mulani, Parvez
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (01) : 124 - 129
  • [7] CLEELAND C, 1991, CANCER, V67, P823, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19910201)67:3+<823::AID-CNCR2820671412>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-S
  • [9] Cleeland C S, 1988, J Pain Symptom Manage, V3, P23, DOI 10.1016/0885-3924(88)90134-0
  • [10] Cleeland C. S., 1994, Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, V23, P129