Phosphorus acquisition from soil by white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.), species with contrasting root development

被引:53
作者
Watt, M [1 ]
Evans, JR [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Biol Sci, Environm Biol Grp, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
cluster roots; proteoid roots; root architecture; root development; soil phosphorus; soybean; white lupin;
D O I
10.1023/A:1022332700686
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
White lupin and soybean have contrasting root morphologies: white lupin develops proteoid or cluster roots, roots with discreet clusters of short, determinate branch roots (rootlets) while soybean develops a more fibrous root system with evenly distributed, longer branch roots. Growth and P acquisition by white lupin and soybean were compared in a soil high in bound, total P, with or without additional inorganic P applied in solution. Additional P increased biomass by 25% and doubled total P in soybean. In contrast, white lupin did not respond to additional P in biomass or total P. However added P decreased cluster development on proteoid roots indicating that white lupin sensed the added P. The reduction in cluster weight per plant was exactly countered by an increase in dry weight of other roots. Soybean root development responded to P application, proliferating branch roots with active meristems in the upper portion of the soil profile where P was applied, and reducing root weight to plant weight by 13%. White lupin did not proliferate roots in response to P application. When P was not added to soil, soybean and lupin acquired similar P per unit root dry weight. However, white lupin accumulated 4.8 times more P per unit root length, suggesting that P acquisition in these plants involved other mechanisms such as the exudation of P solubilizing compounds. Soybean accessed P by developing more root length thus colonising more soil volume than white lupin and, therefore, was better able to take advantage of the added P. Pericycle and root tip meristem activities were critical to the differences in root development between white lupin and soybean, and therefore their responses to plant and soil P.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 283
页数:13
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   AVAILABILITY OF ORGANIC AND INORGANIC FORMS OF PHOSPHORUS TO LUPINS (LUPINUS SPP) [J].
ADAMS, MA ;
PATE, JS .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1992, 145 (01) :107-113
[2]  
Bar-Yosef B, 1991, PLANT ROOTS HIDDEN H, P581
[3]   WHITE LUPIN UTILIZES SOIL-PHOSPHORUS THAT IS UNAVAILABLE TO SOYBEAN [J].
BRAUM, SM ;
HELMKE, PA .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1995, 176 (01) :95-100
[4]   ELONGATION AND BRANCHING OF ROOTS ON SOYBEAN PLANTS IN A CARBON DIOXIDE-ENRICHED AERIAL ENVIRONMENT [J].
DELCASTILLO, D ;
ACOCK, B ;
REDDY, VR ;
ACOCK, MC .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1989, 81 (04) :692-695
[5]   CITRIC-ACID EXCRETION AND PRECIPITATION OF CALCIUM CITRATE IN THE RHIZOSPHERE OF WHITE LUPIN (LUPINUS-ALBUS L) [J].
DINKELAKER, B ;
ROMHELD, V ;
MARSCHNER, H .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1989, 12 (03) :285-292
[6]   PHOSPHORUS AND ALUMINUM RELEASE FROM A SPODIC HORIZON MEDIATED BY ORGANIC-ACIDS [J].
FOX, TR ;
COMERFORD, NB ;
MCFEE, WW .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1990, 54 (06) :1763-1767
[7]   THE ACQUISITION OF PHOSPHORUS BY LUPINUS-ALBUS L .3. THE PROBABLE MECHANISM BY WHICH PHOSPHORUS MOVEMENT IN THE SOIL ROOT INTERFACE IS ENHANCED [J].
GARDNER, WK ;
BARBER, DA ;
PARBERY, DG .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1983, 70 (01) :107-124
[8]   THE ACQUISITION OF PHOSPHORUS BY LUPINUS-ALBUS L .5. THE DIFFUSION OF EXUDATES AWAY FROM ROOTS - A COMPUTER-SIMULATION [J].
GARDNER, WK ;
PARBERY, DG ;
BARBER, DA ;
SWINDEN, L .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1983, 72 (01) :13-29
[9]   THE EXCRETION OF CITRIC AND MALIC-ACID BY PROTEOID ROOTS OF LUPINUS-ALBUS L - EFFECTS ON SOIL SOLUTION CONCENTRATIONS OF PHOSPHATE, IRON, AND ALUMINUM IN THE PROTEOID RHIZOSPHERE IN SAMPLES OF AN OXISOL AND A LUVISOL [J].
GERKE, J ;
ROMER, W ;
JUNGK, A .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PFLANZENERNAHRUNG UND BODENKUNDE, 1994, 157 (04) :289-294
[10]   Acid phosphatase activity in phosphorus-deficient white lupin roots [J].
Gilbert, GA ;
Knight, JD ;
Vance, CP ;
Allan, DL .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 22 (07) :801-810