Risk factors for small bowel obstruction after open rectal cancer resection

被引:5
作者
Afshari, Kevin [1 ]
Chabok, Abbas
Smedh, Kenneth
Nikberg, Maziar
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Vastmanlands Hosp Vasteras, Dept Surg, Colorectal Unit, S-72189 Vasteras, Sweden
关键词
Small bowel obstruction; Rectal cancer; Surgery; Admission; Risk factors;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-021-01072-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is observed in around 10% of patients with prior open abdominal surgery. Rectal resection causes the highest readmission rates. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for readmission for SBO and causes for SBO in patients who needed surgery following rectal cancer surgery. Methods A population-based registry with prospectively gathered data on 752 consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent open pelvic surgery between January 1996 and January 2017 was used. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis was performed, and the risk of SBO was assessed. Results In total, 84 patients (11%) developed SBO after a median follow-up time of 48 months. Of these patients, 57% developed SBO during the 1st year after rectal cancer surgery. Surgery for SBO was performed in 32 patients (4.3%), and the cause of SBO was stoma-related in one-fourth of these patients. In the univariable analysis previous RT and re-laparotomy were found as risk factors for readmission for SBO. Re-laparotomy was an independent risk factor for readmission for SBO (OR 2.824, CI 1.129-7.065, P = 0.026) in the multivariable analysis, but not for surgery for SBO. Rectal resection without anastomoses, splenic flexors mobilization, intraoperative bleeding, operative time were not found as risk factors for SBO. Conclusions One-tenth of rectal cancer patients who had open surgery developed SBO, most commonly within the 1st postoperative year. The risk of SBO is greatest in patients with complications after rectal cancer resection that result in a re-laparotomy.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Nationwide population-based cohort study to assess risk of surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction following open or laparoscopic rectal cancer resection [J].
Andersen, P. ;
Jensen, K. K. ;
Erichsen, R. ;
Froslev, T. ;
Krarup, P. -M. ;
Madsen, M. R. ;
Laurberg, S. ;
Iversen, L. H. .
BJS OPEN, 2017, 1 (02) :30-38
[2]  
Angenete E, 2012, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V147, P359, DOI 10.1001/archsurg.2012.31
[3]   Adverse effects of preoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer:: Long-term follow-up of the Swedish rectal cancer trial [J].
Birgisson, H ;
Påhlman, L ;
Gunnarsson, U ;
Glimelius, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (34) :8697-8705
[4]   Snapshot Study on the Value of Omentoplasty in Abdominoperineal Resection with Primary Perineal Closure for Rectal Cancer [J].
Blok, Robin D. ;
Musters, Gijsbert D. ;
Borstlap, Wernard A. A. ;
Buskens, Christianne J. ;
Bemelman, Wilhelmus A. ;
Tanis, Pieter J. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (03) :729-736
[5]  
Edna TH, 1998, EUR J SURG, V164, P587
[6]   Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study [J].
Ellis, H ;
Moran, BJ ;
Thompson, JN ;
Parker, MC ;
Wilson, MS ;
Menzies, D ;
McGuire, A ;
Lower, AM ;
Hawthorn, RJS ;
O'Brien, F ;
Buchan, S ;
Crowe, AM .
LANCET, 1999, 353 (9163) :1476-1480
[7]   Does a Defunctioning Stoma Impair Anorectal Function After Low Anterior Resection of the Rectum for Cancer? A 12-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Multicenter Trial [J].
Gadan, Soran ;
Floodeen, Hannah ;
Lindgren, Rickard ;
Matthiessen, Peter .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (08) :800-806
[8]   ADHESIOLYSIS [J].
HERSHLAG, A ;
DIAMOND, MP ;
DECHERNEY, AH .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 34 (02) :395-402
[9]   Is the circumferential resection margin a predictor of local recurrence after preoperative radiotherapy and optimal surgery for rectal carcinoma? [J].
HosseinaliKhani, M. ;
Smedh, K. ;
Kraaz, W. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2007, 9 (08) :706-712
[10]  
Menzies D, 2001, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V83, P40