Evaluation of global gravity models from absolute gravity and vertical gravity gradient measurements in Turkey

被引:5
作者
Akdogan, Yunus Aytac [1 ,3 ]
Yildiz, Hasan [1 ]
Ahi, Gonca Okay [2 ]
机构
[1] Gen Directorate Mapping, Geodesy Dept, TR-06590 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey
[3] Gen Directorate Mapping, Geodesy Dept, Tip Fak Caddesi, TR-06590 Cebeci Ankara, Turkey
关键词
absolute gravity; vertical gravity gradients; gravity disturbance; global gravity models; EGM2008; Turkey; GEOPOTENTIAL MODELS; FIELD MODEL; SPECTRAL EVALUATION; RIVER-BASIN; GOCE; GRACE; VALIDATION; SURFACE; CHAMP;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6501/ab2f1c
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A global gravity model (GGM) is a mathematical function describing the gravity field of the Earth. The assessment of GGMs involves identifying the best-fitting model to local gravity field for geodetic and geophysical applications. Thus, highly accurate independent datasets are required to obtain the appropriate model. In general, GPS/levelling data have been used for this purpose. If these measurements are not performed simultaneously, they may not be reliable due to vertical deformations especially in seismically active countries. Therefore, we used highly precise absolute and vertical gravity gradient measurements obtained by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey's (TUBITAK) National Metrology Institute and General Directorate of Mapping within the frame of Turkish Height System Modernization and Gravity Recovery Project over the period of 2016-2018 from Turkey to choose the best GGM for the whole of Turkey among the 19 latest tested satellite-only and combined GGMs (2004-2018). Our results showed that vertical gravity gradient measurements could also be used for the regional validation of GGMs as an independent in situ dataset. The GOCE based XGM2016 combined model and GO_CONS_GCF_2_TIM_ R5 satellite-based model were found to be the best-fitting models. The results also showed improvements over the widely used EGM2008 up to the spherical degree 270 for Turkey. The improvements of the GOCE models over the EGM2008 model are mostly seen in mountainous areas such as the Black sea, Aegean Sea, some parts of the Mediterranean, and South-eastern Anatolia regions with maximum improvements in the coastal areas of the Eastern Black Sea. The best-fitting GGMs to local gravity field identified with these measurements could be used for further geodetic and geophysical purposes in Turkey.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of GOCE/GRACE Global Geopotential Models over Greece with Collocated GPS/Levelling Observations and Local Gravity Data
    Vergos, G. S.
    Grigoriadis, V. N.
    Tziavos, I. N.
    Kotsakis, C.
    GRAVITY, GEOID AND HEIGHT SYSTEMS, 2014, 141 : 85 - 92
  • [42] A fast modeling approach for local gravity field recovery from full airborne gravity gradient tensor
    Wu, YiHao
    Luo, ZhiCai
    Wang, HaiHong
    He, XiuFeng
    Yagn, Meng
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2025, 68 (03): : 769 - 787
  • [43] Towards a dynamic absolute gravity system
    Brown, JM
    Niebauer, TM
    Klingele, E
    GRAVITY GEOID AND GEODYNAMICS 2000, 2002, 123 : 223 - 228
  • [44] Analysis of limitations on recovery of gravity field based on satellite gravity gradient data
    Wan, Xiaoyun
    Yu, Jinhai
    Liang, Lei
    Ran, Jiangjun
    Annan, Richard Fiifi
    GEODESY AND GEODYNAMICS, 2021, 12 (01) : 31 - 42
  • [45] Gravity gradient tensors derived from radial component of gravity vector using Taylor series expansion
    Chen, Tao
    Yang, Dikun
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 228 (01) : 412 - 431
  • [46] Rigorous Evaluation of Gravity Change due to Crustal Vertical Deformation
    Wang, Jiapei
    Shen, Chongyang
    Xuan, Songbai
    Wu, Guiju
    Sun, Kai
    PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2021, 178 (06) : 2077 - 2089
  • [47] Comparison and testing of GOCE global gravity models in Central Europe
    Janak, Juraj
    Pitonak, Martin
    JOURNAL OF GEODETIC SCIENCE, 2011, 1 (04) : 333 - 347
  • [48] Modern global earth's gravity field models and their errors
    Koneshov V.N.
    Nepoklonov V.B.
    Sermyagin R.A.
    Lidovskaya E.A.
    Koneshov, V.N., 1600, Maik Nauka Publishing / Springer SBM (04): : 147 - 155
  • [49] Gravity field models derived from Swarm GPS data
    da Encarnacao, Joao Teixeira
    Arnold, Daniel
    Bezdek, Ales
    Dahle, Christoph
    Doornbos, Eelco
    van den IJssel, Jose
    Jaggi, Adrian
    Mayer-Guerr, Torsten
    Sebera, Josef
    Visser, Pieter
    Zehentner, Norbert
    EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2016, 68
  • [50] A regional approach for high-resolution gravity anomaly recovery from full airborne gravity gradient tensor
    Wu, Yihao
    He, Xiufeng
    Shi, Hongkai
    Luo, Zhicai
    Abulaitijiang, Adili
    Wang, Haihong
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 238 (03) : 1383 - 1403