Evaluation of global gravity models from absolute gravity and vertical gravity gradient measurements in Turkey

被引:5
作者
Akdogan, Yunus Aytac [1 ,3 ]
Yildiz, Hasan [1 ]
Ahi, Gonca Okay [2 ]
机构
[1] Gen Directorate Mapping, Geodesy Dept, TR-06590 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey
[3] Gen Directorate Mapping, Geodesy Dept, Tip Fak Caddesi, TR-06590 Cebeci Ankara, Turkey
关键词
absolute gravity; vertical gravity gradients; gravity disturbance; global gravity models; EGM2008; Turkey; GEOPOTENTIAL MODELS; FIELD MODEL; SPECTRAL EVALUATION; RIVER-BASIN; GOCE; GRACE; VALIDATION; SURFACE; CHAMP;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6501/ab2f1c
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A global gravity model (GGM) is a mathematical function describing the gravity field of the Earth. The assessment of GGMs involves identifying the best-fitting model to local gravity field for geodetic and geophysical applications. Thus, highly accurate independent datasets are required to obtain the appropriate model. In general, GPS/levelling data have been used for this purpose. If these measurements are not performed simultaneously, they may not be reliable due to vertical deformations especially in seismically active countries. Therefore, we used highly precise absolute and vertical gravity gradient measurements obtained by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey's (TUBITAK) National Metrology Institute and General Directorate of Mapping within the frame of Turkish Height System Modernization and Gravity Recovery Project over the period of 2016-2018 from Turkey to choose the best GGM for the whole of Turkey among the 19 latest tested satellite-only and combined GGMs (2004-2018). Our results showed that vertical gravity gradient measurements could also be used for the regional validation of GGMs as an independent in situ dataset. The GOCE based XGM2016 combined model and GO_CONS_GCF_2_TIM_ R5 satellite-based model were found to be the best-fitting models. The results also showed improvements over the widely used EGM2008 up to the spherical degree 270 for Turkey. The improvements of the GOCE models over the EGM2008 model are mostly seen in mountainous areas such as the Black sea, Aegean Sea, some parts of the Mediterranean, and South-eastern Anatolia regions with maximum improvements in the coastal areas of the Eastern Black Sea. The best-fitting GGMs to local gravity field identified with these measurements could be used for further geodetic and geophysical purposes in Turkey.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of GOCE global gravity field models using terrestrial gravity data in Norway
    Sprlak, M.
    Gerlach, C.
    Pettersen, B. R.
    JOURNAL OF GEODETIC SCIENCE, 2012, 2 (02) : 134 - 143
  • [22] Low-Earth Orbit Determination from Gravity Gradient Measurements
    Sun, Xiucong
    Chen, Pei
    Macabiau, Christophe
    Han, Chao
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2016, 123 : 350 - 362
  • [23] Global gravity field modeling based on GOCE and complementary gravity data
    Fecher, Thomas
    Pail, Roland
    Gruber, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2015, 35 : 120 - 127
  • [24] The use of absolute gravity data for the validation of Global Geopotential Models and for improving quasigeoid heights determined from satellite-only Global Geopotential Models
    Godah, Walyeldeen
    Krynski, Jan
    Szelachowska, Malgorzata
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 152 : 38 - 47
  • [25] Gravity variation around Shinmoe-dake volcano from February 2011 through March 2012—Results of continuous absolute gravity observation and repeated hybrid gravity measurements
    Shuhei Okubo
    Yoshiyuki Tanaka
    Sadato Ueki
    Hiromitsu Oshima
    Tokumitsu Maekawa
    Yuichi Imanishi
    Earth, Planets and Space, 2013, 65 : 563 - 571
  • [26] Improved source parameter constraints for five undersea earthquakes from north component of GRACE gravity and gravity gradient change measurements
    Dai, Chunli
    Shum, C. K.
    Guo, Junyi
    Shang, Kun
    Tapley, Byron
    Wang, Rongjiang
    EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2016, 443 : 118 - 128
  • [27] Gravity gradient distribution in mainland China from GOCE satellite gravity gradiometry data
    Xu Haijun
    Zhang Yongzhi
    Duan Hurong
    GEODESY AND GEODYNAMICS, 2015, 6 (01) : 41 - 45
  • [28] Absolute Gravity Network in Spain
    Rodriguez Pujol, E.
    FISICA DE LA TIERRA, 2005, 17 : 147 - 163
  • [29] Absolute gravity values in Norway
    Breili, Kristian
    Gjevestad, Jon Glenn
    Lysaker, Dagny Iren
    Omang, Ove Christian Dahl
    Pettersen, Bjorn Ragnvald
    NORSK GEOGRAFISK TIDSSKRIFT-NORWEGIAN JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY, 2010, 64 (02) : 79 - 84
  • [30] Combining relative and absolute gravity measurements to enhance volcano monitoring
    F. Greco
    G. Currenti
    G. D’Agostino
    A. Germak
    R. Napoli
    A. Pistorio
    C. Del Negro
    Bulletin of Volcanology, 2012, 74 : 1745 - 1756