Ramped vs. standard bruce protocol in children: A comparison exercise responses

被引:4
作者
DiBella, JA [1 ]
Johnson, EM
Cabrera, ME
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Pediat, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Rainbow Babies & Childrens Hosp, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1123/pes.14.4.391
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
We compared maximal exercise parameters obtained using both a ramped Bruce (BR) and a standard Bruce treadmill protocol (BS) in 44 healthy children (9.9 +/- 1.9 yr) and adolescents (15.9 +/- 1.7 yr). The average weight and height for children was 36.7 +/- 10.7 kg and 141.2 +/- 13.2 cm, while for adolescents was 64.4 +/- 13.9 kg and 168.9 +/- 7.5 cm. No significant differences were found in peak heart rate (HRpeak) between protocols for children (BS: 198 +/- 10; BR: 196 +/- 11 bpm) or adolescents (BS: 193 +/- 2; BR: 192 +/- 11 bpm). Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) was also not significantly different for children (BS: 1.81 +/- 0.64; BR: 1.84 +/- 0.74 L/min) or adolescents (BS: 2.66 +/- 0.61; BR: 2.72 +/- 0.67 L/min). Based on our results, we conclude that equivalent peak HR and VO2 values can be obtained in normal children and adolescents using a standard or a ramped Bruce protocol.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 400
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Responses of non-obese white children to treadmill exercise [J].
Ahmad, F ;
Kavey, REW ;
Kveselis, DA ;
Gaum, WE ;
Smith, FC .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2001, 139 (02) :284-290
[2]   Comparison of ramp versus step protocols for exercise testing in patients ≥60 years of age [J].
Bader, DS ;
Maguire, TE ;
Balady, GJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 83 (01) :11-14
[3]  
BAECKE JAH, 1982, AM J CLIN NUTR, V36, P936
[4]   A NEW METHOD FOR DETECTING ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD BY GAS-EXCHANGE [J].
BEAVER, WL ;
WASSERMAN, K ;
WHIPP, BJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 60 (06) :2020-2027
[5]  
Beunen GP, 2001, AM J HUM BIOL, V13, P173, DOI 10.1002/1520-6300(200102/03)13:2<173::AID-AJHB1026>3.3.CO
[6]  
2-D
[7]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[8]  
BRUCE R A, 1956, Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis, V25, P321
[9]   OPTIMIZING THE EXERCISE PROTOCOL FOR CARDIOPULMONARY ASSESSMENT [J].
BUCHFUHRER, MJ ;
HANSEN, JE ;
ROBINSON, TE ;
SUE, DY ;
WASSERMAN, K ;
WHIPP, BJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1983, 55 (05) :1558-1564
[10]  
Kaminsky L A, 1998, J Cardiopulm Rehabil, V18, P438, DOI 10.1097/00008483-199811000-00006