New assessment of the fast ion energy in ASDEX upgrade H-mode discharges

被引:9
作者
Tardini, G. [1 ]
Weiland, M. [1 ]
Angioni, C. [1 ]
Cavedon, M. [1 ]
Ryter, F. [1 ]
Schneider, P. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Plasma Phys, Boltzmannstr 2, D-85748 Garching, Germany
关键词
confinement; H-mode; fast-ions; neutral beam injection; scaling laws;
D O I
10.1088/1741-4326/abd3eb
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
Confinement scaling laws such as IPB98(y, 2) are widely used to extrapolate the performance of present tokamaks to next-step devices such as ITER or DEMO. The thermal energy of the plasma (W-th), which is used to determine the energy confinement time for most scaling laws, is difficult to measure, due to the sizeable uncertainties in the experimental kinetic profiles. The common approach in the tokamak community is to derive W-th as the difference between the measured magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) energy and some simulation-based estimate of the fast ion energy W-fi. In H-mode plasmas W-fi can be as high as W-th, in presence of neutral beam injection (NBI) or ion cyclotron radio frequency heating (ICRF), therefore an accurate assessment of W-fi is crucial to have a somewhat reliable H-factor, regardless of the power-scaling of a given scaling law. In this paper we aim at evaluating the current approach to estimate W-fi, by comparing its predictions with a wide database of calculations using validated NBI codes. Systematic deviations and trends, as well as statistical scatter are discussed. We use a comprehensive database of AUG H-mode deuterium plasmas, with significant variations of plasma current, NBI power and plasma density. We neglect thereby the fast-ion losses caused by MHD modes and the synergy effect between NBI and ICRF. A new approach is proposed based on the newly developed fast NBI code RABBIT.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Cavedon M., 2012, THESIS U PADUA
[2]   Fast-ion D-alpha measurements at ASDEX Upgrade [J].
Geiger, B. ;
Garcia-Munoz, M. ;
Heidbrink, W. W. ;
McDermott, R. M. ;
Tardini, G. ;
Dux, R. ;
Fischer, R. ;
Igochine, V. .
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2011, 53 (06)
[3]  
Hawryluk R., 1980, Physics of Plasmas Close to Thermonuclear Conditions, Vvol 1, P19
[4]   Mechanisms of energetic-particle transport in magnetically confined plasmas [J].
Heidbrink, W. W. ;
White, R. B. .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2020, 27 (03)
[5]  
ITER Physics Expert Group, 1999, Nucl. Fusion, V39, P2137, DOI [10.1088/0029-5515/39/12/301, DOI 10.1088/0029-5515/39/12/301]
[6]  
Koleva M., SOFT 2020 C PRIV COM
[7]   Analytical solutions to the Grad-Shafranov equation for tokamak equilibrium with dissimilar source functions [J].
Mc Carthy, PJ .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 1999, 6 (09) :3554-3560
[8]   The tokamak Monte Carlo fast ion module NUBEAM in the National Transport Code Collaboration library [J].
Pankin, A ;
McCune, D ;
Andre, R ;
Bateman, G ;
Kritz, A .
COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2004, 159 (03) :157-184
[9]   Reduced energetic particle transport models enable comprehensive time-dependent tokamak simulations [J].
Podesta, M. ;
Bardoczi, L. ;
Collins, C. S. ;
Gorelenkov, N. N. ;
Heidbrink, W. W. ;
Duarte, V. N. ;
Kramer, G. J. ;
Fredrickson, E. D. ;
Gorelenkova, M. ;
Kim, D. ;
Liu, D. ;
Poli, F. M. ;
Van Zeeland, M. A. ;
White, R. B. .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 2019, 59 (10)
[10]  
Ryter F., 2020, NUCL FUSION PRIVATE