Social-Psychological Context Moderates Incentives to Co-produce: Evidence from a Large-Scale Survey Experiment on Park Upkeep in an Urban Setting

被引:22
作者
Letki, Natalia [1 ]
Steen, Trui [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warsaw, Fac Polit Sci & Int Studies, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Publ Governance Inst, Leuven, Belgium
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1111/puar.13340
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
This paper presents evidence that the relevance of incentives to co-produce depends on the social-psychological context under which actors operate. We propose that context (including community attachment, trust in local authorities, ethnic diversity, unemployment level, and population density) moderates effect of incentives (utility of the co-produced service, monetary and reputational rewards, and social norms). Through a survey experiment carried out in 593 urban locations across 13 countries, we show that willingness to co-produce increases with community attachment and decreases with ethnic diversity of the local area. The relevance of utility and social norms as determinants of willingness to co-produce depends on the social-psychological context. Reputational and monetary rewards have limited effect, and their relation to the context is less clear. All incentives are largely irrelevant when actors operate in cooperation-conducive circumstances, where co-production is a value in itself. However, their importance as "tools" to encourage co-production arises under challenging contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:935 / 950
页数:16
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Why do public-sector clients coproduce? Toward a contingency theory [J].
Alford, J .
ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2002, 34 (01) :32-56
[2]   Co-Production of Public Services in Australia: The Roles of Government Organisations and Co-Producers [J].
Alford, John ;
Yates, Sophie .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2016, 75 (02) :159-175
[3]   Disentangling area effects: Evidence from deprived and non-deprived neighbourhoods [J].
Atkinson, R ;
Kintrea, K .
URBAN STUDIES, 2001, 38 (12) :2277-2298
[4]  
Baer D., 2016, The Palgrave handbook of volunteering, civic participation, and nonprofit associations, P580
[5]   A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy: Eight Mechanisms That Drive Charitable Giving [J].
Bekkers, Rene ;
Wiepking, Pamala .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2011, 40 (05) :924-973
[6]   Public charity offer as a proximate factor of evolved reputation-building strategy: an experimental analysis of a real-life situation [J].
Bereczkei, Tamas ;
Birkas, Bela ;
Kerekes, Zsuzsanna .
EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2007, 28 (04) :277-284
[7]  
Brandsen T, 2018, ROUT ST PUBL MANAGE, P3
[8]  
BRSEN T, 2015, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V76, P427
[9]   TOWARD A DEFINITION OF THE CO-PRODUCTION CONCEPT [J].
BRUDNEY, JL ;
ENGLAND, RE .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1983, 43 (01) :59-65
[10]   Designing Public Participation Processes [J].
Bryson, John M. ;
Quick, Kathryn S. ;
Slotterback, Carissa Schively ;
Crosby, Barbara C. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2013, 73 (01) :23-34