Job crafting for lean engagement: The interplay of day and job-level characteristics

被引:31
作者
Cullinane, Sarah-Jane [1 ]
Bosak, Janine [2 ]
Flood, Patrick C. [2 ]
Demerouti, Evangelia [3 ]
机构
[1] Trinity Coll Dublin, Trinity Business Sch, Dublin 2, Ireland
[2] Dublin City Univ, DCU Business Sch, Dublin 9, Ireland
[3] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Innovat Sci, Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
Job crafting; job design; work engagement; diary study; DEMANDS-RESOURCES MODEL; WORK ENGAGEMENT; SELF-EFFICACY; DESIGN; PERFORMANCE; BURNOUT; CONTEXT; AUTONOMY; IMPACT; TEAM;
D O I
10.1080/1359432X.2017.1320280
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The quality of working life under the production system known as lean manufacturing (LM) is a heavily debated topic. Little is known about the engagement level of employees under this system. Our study is concerned with how employees in this context craft their jobs to enhance their own engagement, and we specifically consider how daily skill utilization triggers this process. Using a cross-level perspective, we further consider whether job-level characteristics relevant to the lean context, namely task interdependence and boundary control, restrict or facilitate the effects of daily skill utilization. A daily diary study was conducted over 4 working days with 64 employees in a large company utilizing LM. The results of multilevel structural equation modelling demonstrated that on a given day, skill utilization was associated with seeking resources, and this relationship was stronger when employees had high boundary control and low task interdependence in their general job roles. Results further demonstrated that employees experienced higher work engagement on days when they sought resources and challenges. Our findings illustrate the motivational potential of job crafting under LM and how crafting activities can be facilitated by the design of jobs and allocation of daily tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 554
页数:14
相关论文
共 107 条
  • [1] SHARED LEARNING
    ADLER, PS
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1990, 36 (08) : 938 - 957
  • [2] Best-Practice Recommendations for Estimating Cross-Level Interaction Effects Using Multilevel Modeling
    Aguinis, Herman
    Gottfredson, Ryan K.
    Culpepper, Steven Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2013, 39 (06) : 1490 - 1528
  • [3] Aiken L.S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interaction
  • [4] Is lean mean? workplace transformation and employee well-being
    Anderson-Connolly, R
    Grunberg, L
    Greenberg, ES
    Moore, S
    [J]. WORK EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIETY, 2002, 16 (03) : 389 - 413
  • [5] [Anonymous], STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1995, Multilevel Modeling Newsletter
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2006, THESIS U PITTSBURGH
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2010, Mplus user's guide
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2007, THESIS U PITTSBURGH
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2013, ADV POSITIVE ORG PSY