Using Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Quantify the Value of Genomic-Based Diagnostic Tests: Recommendations for Practice and Research

被引:9
作者
Spackman, Eldon [1 ]
Hinde, Sebastian [2 ]
Bojke, Laura [2 ]
Payne, Katherine [3 ]
Sculpher, Mark [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Community Hlth Sci, 3280 Hosp Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
[2] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York, N Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Manchester Ctr Hlth Econ, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
cost-effectiveness analysis; genomic testing; methods; health economics; DETECT HEREDITARY PREDISPOSITION; HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; GENETICS SERVICES; METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES; PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; PHARMACOGENOMICS; CANCER; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1089/gtmb.2017.0105
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Aims: New sequencing technologies allow increased opportunities to use genomic-based diagnostic tests (genomic tests) in routine clinical practice, which will impact healthcare budgets and patients' outcomes. This article aims to generate a list of recommendations on how the principles and methods of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can be used to quantify the costs and benefits of genomic tests. Methods: A systematic literature search identified publications describing the use of CEA to evaluate genomic tests. Data were extracted as key concepts to produce a thematic list of previously described challenges and solutions to using CEA to evaluate genomic tests. Defining features of evaluating genomic tests were categorized into a list of key recommendations for applying methods in practice and for research needs. Results: Features producing challenges in the implementation of CEA to evaluate genomic tests were as follows: the ability of the tests to diagnose multiple disorders; potential consequences for future generations suggesting an infinite time horizon; and the potential need to consider nonhealth benefits. Conclusions: CEA was identified as an appropriate evaluative framework for genomic tests, although standard methods may need modification and important method research questions remain. Key recommendations suggest a need for research to reflect: sharing genomic information across generations; genomic tests for multiple disorders; and health and nonhealth benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 716
页数:12
相关论文
共 80 条
[61]  
Payne K, 2010, PHARMACOGENOMICS, V11, P643, DOI [10.2217/pgs.10.45, 10.2217/PGS.10.45]
[62]   FISH AND CHIPS ALL ROUND? REGULATION OF DNA-BASED GENETIC DIAGNOSTICS [J].
Payne, Katherine .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2009, 18 (11) :1233-1236
[63]   An introduction to cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis of pharmacogenomics [J].
Phillips, KA ;
Veenstra, D ;
Van Bebber, S ;
Sakowski, J .
PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2003, 4 (03) :231-239
[64]   A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of pharmacogenomic interventions [J].
Phillips, KA ;
Van Bebber, SL .
PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2004, 5 (08) :1139-1149
[65]  
Phillips Kathryn A., 2003, Current Pharmacogenomics, V1, P277, DOI 10.2174/1570160033476197
[66]   UTILITY-FUNCTIONS FOR LIFE YEARS AND HEALTH-STATUS [J].
PLISKIN, JS ;
SHEPARD, DS ;
WEINSTEIN, MC .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1980, 28 (01) :206-224
[67]   How Comparative Effectiveness Research Can Help Advance 'Personalized Medicine' In Cancer Treatment [J].
Ramsey, Scott D. ;
Veenstra, David ;
Tunis, Sean R. ;
Garrison, Louis ;
Crowley, John J. ;
Baker, Laurence H. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2011, 30 (12) :2259-2268
[68]   Genetic screening by DNA technology: A systematic review of health economic evidence [J].
Rogowski, Wolf .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2006, 22 (03) :327-337
[69]   Decision analysis to complete diagnostic research by closing the gap between test characteristics and cost-effectiveness [J].
Schaafsma, Joanna D. ;
van der Graaf, Yolanda ;
Rinkel, Gabriel J. E. ;
Buskens, Erik .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 62 (12) :1248-1252
[70]  
*SECR ADV COMM GEN, 2007, REAL PROM PHARM OPP