Using Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Quantify the Value of Genomic-Based Diagnostic Tests: Recommendations for Practice and Research

被引:9
作者
Spackman, Eldon [1 ]
Hinde, Sebastian [2 ]
Bojke, Laura [2 ]
Payne, Katherine [3 ]
Sculpher, Mark [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Community Hlth Sci, 3280 Hosp Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
[2] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York, N Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Manchester Ctr Hlth Econ, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
cost-effectiveness analysis; genomic testing; methods; health economics; DETECT HEREDITARY PREDISPOSITION; HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; GENETICS SERVICES; METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES; PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; PHARMACOGENOMICS; CANCER; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1089/gtmb.2017.0105
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Aims: New sequencing technologies allow increased opportunities to use genomic-based diagnostic tests (genomic tests) in routine clinical practice, which will impact healthcare budgets and patients' outcomes. This article aims to generate a list of recommendations on how the principles and methods of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can be used to quantify the costs and benefits of genomic tests. Methods: A systematic literature search identified publications describing the use of CEA to evaluate genomic tests. Data were extracted as key concepts to produce a thematic list of previously described challenges and solutions to using CEA to evaluate genomic tests. Defining features of evaluating genomic tests were categorized into a list of key recommendations for applying methods in practice and for research needs. Results: Features producing challenges in the implementation of CEA to evaluate genomic tests were as follows: the ability of the tests to diagnose multiple disorders; potential consequences for future generations suggesting an infinite time horizon; and the potential need to consider nonhealth benefits. Conclusions: CEA was identified as an appropriate evaluative framework for genomic tests, although standard methods may need modification and important method research questions remain. Key recommendations suggest a need for research to reflect: sharing genomic information across generations; genomic tests for multiple disorders; and health and nonhealth benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 716
页数:12
相关论文
共 80 条
[21]   Economic Opportunities and Challenges for Pharmacogenomics [J].
Deverka, Patricia A. ;
Vernon, John ;
McLeod, Howard L. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY, 2010, 50 :423-437
[22]   A review of economic evaluations of genetic testing services and interventions (2004-2009) [J].
Djalalov, Sandjar ;
Musa, Zahra ;
Mendelson, Michael ;
Siminovitch, Katherine ;
Hoch, Jeffrey .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 13 (02) :89-94
[23]   Steering a course around the genetic iceberg [J].
Edwards, RT .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 2001, 23 (01) :3-4
[24]   Comparative Effectiveness Research and Personalized Medicine Catalyzing or Colliding? [J].
Epstein, Robert S. ;
Teagarden, J. Russell .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2010, 28 (10) :905-913
[25]  
European Commission Health Research Directorate, 2011, PERS MED OPP CHALL E
[26]   Cost-Utility Analyses of Diagnostic Laboratory Tests: A Systematic Review [J].
Fang, ChiHui ;
Otero, Hansel J. ;
Greenberg, Dan ;
Neumann, Peter J. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (08) :1010-1018
[27]  
Faulkner E, 2011, INT SOC PHARM OUTC R
[28]  
Faulkner E, 2010, INT SOC PHARM OUTC R
[29]   Challenges in the Development and Reimbursement of Personalized Medicine-Payer and Manufacturer Perspectives and Implications for Health Economics and Outcomes Research: A Report of the ISPOR Personalized Medicine Special Interest Group [J].
Faulkner, Eric ;
Annemans, Leven ;
Garrison, Lou ;
Helfand, Mark ;
Holtorf, Anke-Peggy ;
Hornberger, John ;
Hughes, Dyfrig ;
Li, Tracy ;
Malone, Daniel ;
Payne, Katherine ;
Siebert, Uwe ;
Towse, Adrian ;
Veenstra, David ;
Watkins, John .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (08) :1162-1171
[30]   The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in the era of pharmacogenomics [J].
Flowers, CR ;
Veenstra, D .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2004, 22 (08) :481-493