Using Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Quantify the Value of Genomic-Based Diagnostic Tests: Recommendations for Practice and Research

被引:9
作者
Spackman, Eldon [1 ]
Hinde, Sebastian [2 ]
Bojke, Laura [2 ]
Payne, Katherine [3 ]
Sculpher, Mark [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Community Hlth Sci, 3280 Hosp Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
[2] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York, N Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Manchester Ctr Hlth Econ, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
cost-effectiveness analysis; genomic testing; methods; health economics; DETECT HEREDITARY PREDISPOSITION; HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; GENETICS SERVICES; METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES; PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; PHARMACOGENOMICS; CANCER; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1089/gtmb.2017.0105
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Aims: New sequencing technologies allow increased opportunities to use genomic-based diagnostic tests (genomic tests) in routine clinical practice, which will impact healthcare budgets and patients' outcomes. This article aims to generate a list of recommendations on how the principles and methods of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can be used to quantify the costs and benefits of genomic tests. Methods: A systematic literature search identified publications describing the use of CEA to evaluate genomic tests. Data were extracted as key concepts to produce a thematic list of previously described challenges and solutions to using CEA to evaluate genomic tests. Defining features of evaluating genomic tests were categorized into a list of key recommendations for applying methods in practice and for research needs. Results: Features producing challenges in the implementation of CEA to evaluate genomic tests were as follows: the ability of the tests to diagnose multiple disorders; potential consequences for future generations suggesting an infinite time horizon; and the potential need to consider nonhealth benefits. Conclusions: CEA was identified as an appropriate evaluative framework for genomic tests, although standard methods may need modification and important method research questions remain. Key recommendations suggest a need for research to reflect: sharing genomic information across generations; genomic tests for multiple disorders; and health and nonhealth benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 716
页数:12
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Cost effectiveness analysis of antenatal HIV screening in United Kingdom [J].
Ades, AE ;
Sculpher, MJ ;
Gibb, DM ;
Gupta, R ;
Ratcliffe, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7219) :1230-1234
[2]   Current Methodological Issues in the Economic Assessment of Personalized Medicine [J].
Annemans, Lieven ;
Redekop, Ken ;
Payne, Katherine .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (06) :S20-S26
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2011
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, METHODS EC EVALUATI
[5]   Economic Evaluations Conducted for Assessment of Genetic Testing Technologies: A Systematic Review [J].
Assasi, Nazila ;
Schwartz, Lisa ;
Tarride, Jean-Eric ;
Goeree, Ron ;
Xie, Feng .
GENETIC TESTING AND MOLECULAR BIOMARKERS, 2012, 16 (11) :1322-1335
[6]   Pharmacogenomics and the evolution of healthcare - Is it time for cost-effectiveness analysis at the individual level? [J].
Bala, MV ;
Zarkin, GA .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2004, 22 (08) :495-498
[7]   Implications of spillover effects within the family for medical cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Basu, A ;
Meltzer, D .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 24 (04) :751-773
[8]   A taxonomy of model structures for economic evaluation of health technologies [J].
Brennan, Alan ;
Chick, Stephen E. ;
Davies, Ruth .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2006, 15 (12) :1295-1310
[9]  
Brown ML, 1996, INT J CANCER, V69, P55, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19960220)69:1<55::AID-IJC14>3.3.CO
[10]  
2-A