Optimized seismic retrofit of steel-concrete composite buildings

被引:21
作者
Papavasileiou, Georgios S. [1 ]
Charmpis, Dimos C. [2 ]
Lagaros, Nikos D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wolverhampton, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Wulfruna St, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, England
[2] Univ Cyprus, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 75 Kallipoleos Str,POB 20537, CY-1678 Nicosia, Cyprus
[3] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Civil Engn, Inst Struct Anal & Antiseism Res, 9 Heroon Polytech Str,Zografou Campus, Athens 15780, Greece
关键词
Strengthening; Concrete jacket; Steel cage; Steel bracing; Cost-effectiveness; Structural optimization; RC FRAMES; JACKETED COLUMNS; STRENGTH; PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR; DESIGN; SYSTEMS; ANGLES; BEAMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110573
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This work is focused on comparatively assessing the cost-effectiveness of three seismic retrofit approaches for non-code-conforming frame buildings with steel-concrete composite columns. The first two of the assessed retrofit approaches aim in indirectly enhancing structural system performance by strengthening individual composite columns using reinforced concrete jackets or concrete-covered steel cages. The third retrofit approach considered aims in upgrading the composite building frame at hand by installing steel bracings at selected bays. A specially developed structural optimization procedure is used to perform an objective comparison of the cost-effectiveness of the three retrofit approaches. The objective of the optimization procedure is to minimize the total retrofit material cost, while constraints are imposed to ensure the satisfaction of design requirements for the retrofitted structure regarding member capacities (according to Eurocodes 3 and 4 for steel beams and composite columns, respectively), structural system performance under horizontal loading (based on interstorey drifts calculated by pushover analyses) and fundamental periods (obtained from eigenvalue analyses). By defining 30 cases of under-designed 2-storey, 4-storey and 6-storey composite buildings (Le. buildings with steel-concrete composite columns), an extensive numerical investigation involving 120 retrofit optimization runs was conducted. The results obtained provide insight into the relative cost-effectiveness of the three seismic retrofit approaches and reveal certain conditions under which each approach is economically most viable.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]   A general purpose real-world structural design optimization computing platform [J].
Lagaros, Nikos D. .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2014, 49 (06) :1047-1066
[22]   Modeling of RC columns strengthened with RC jackets [J].
Lampropoulos, A. P. ;
Dritsos, S. E. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2011, 40 (15) :1689-1705
[23]   Seismic steel jacketing of rectangular RC bridge columns for the mitigation of lap-splice failures [J].
Lin, Min-Lang ;
Chen, Pei-Ching ;
Tsai, Keh-Chyuan ;
Yu, Yi-Jer ;
Liu, Jun-Gu .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2010, 39 (15) :1687-1710
[24]   Seismic behaviour factor, R, for steel X-braced and knee-braced RC buildings [J].
Maheri, MR ;
Akbari, R .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2003, 25 (12) :1505-1513
[25]   Use of steel bracing in reinforced concrete frames [J].
Maheri, MR ;
Sahebi, A .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 1997, 19 (12) :1018-1024
[26]   Environmental assessment of cost optimized structural systems in tall buildings [J].
Mavrokapnidis, Dimitris ;
Mitropoulou, Chara Ch ;
Lagaros, Nikos D. .
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2019, 24
[27]   Innovative metal systems for seismic upgrading of RC structures [J].
Mazzolani, F. M. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2008, 64 (7-8) :882-895
[28]  
Mazzoni S, 2006, PACIFIC EARTHQ ENG R
[29]   Strength and ductility of RC jacketed columns: A simplified analytical method [J].
Minafo, Giovanni ;
Di Trapani, Fabio ;
Amato, Giuseppina .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2016, 122 :184-195
[30]   Reinforced concrete columns strengthened with angles and battens subjected to eccentric load [J].
Montuori, Rosario ;
Piluso, Vincenzo .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2009, 31 (02) :539-550