Host selection and utilisation of Sonchus oleraceus (Asteraceae) by Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae):: A genetic analysis

被引:14
作者
Gu, H [1 ]
Cao, A
Walter, GH
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Plant Sci Appl Entomol, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Plant Protect, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Queensland, Dept Zool & Entomol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
oviposition preference; larval growth; heritability; genetic correlation; Helicoverpa armigera; common sowthistle; cotton;
D O I
10.1111/j.1744-7348.2001.tb00114.x
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) prefers the common sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus L.) to cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) for oviposition in the field in Australia. Using the common sowthistle and cotton as host plants, we carried out this study to evaluate genetic variation in both oviposition preference and larval growth and genetic correlation between maternal preference and larval performance. There was a significant genetic component of phenotypic variation in both characters, and the heritability of oviposition preference was estimated as 0.602. Helicoverpa armigera larvae survived slightly better and grew significantly faster on common sowthistle than on cotton, but genetic correlation between maternal preference and larval growth performance was not detectable. Instead, larval growth performance on the two hosts changed with families, which renders the interaction between family and host plant significant. As a result, the genetic correlation between mean values of larval growth across the two host species was not different from zero. These results are discussed in the context of the relationship between H. armigera and the common sowthistle and the polyphagous behaviour of this insect in general.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 299
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WORLDS WORST WEEDS D
[2]   OVIPOSITION SITE PREFERENCE AND LARVAL MORTALITY IN A LEAF-MINING MOTH [J].
AUERBACH, M ;
SIMBERLOFF, D .
ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1989, 14 (02) :131-140
[3]  
Auld BA, 1987, WEEDS ILLUSTRATED BO
[4]  
BARKER JSF, 1992, EVOLUTION, V46, P1070, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb00620.x
[5]  
Berdegué M, 1998, ENTOMOL EXP APPL, V89, P57, DOI 10.1023/A:1003464102518
[6]   Genetic and environmental variation in oviposition behaviour in the mycophagous Drosophila suboccidentalis Spcr. [J].
Courtney, S. P. ;
Chen, G. K. .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 1988, 2 (04) :521-528
[8]  
Falconer D. S., 1989, Introduction to quantitative genetics.
[9]   HOST PLANT PREFERENCES OF POPULATIONS OF HELICOVERPA-ARMIGERA (HUBNER) (LEPIDOPTERA, NOCTUIDAE) FROM DIFFERENT GEOGRAPHIC LOCATIONS [J].
FIREMPONG, S ;
ZALUCKI, MP .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1990, 37 (06) :665-673
[10]   THE ECOLOGY OF HELIOTHIS SPECIES IN RELATION TO AGROECOSYSTEMS [J].
FITT, GP .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, 1989, 34 :17-52