Intra- and interexaminer reliability of anthropometric measurements of term infants

被引:74
作者
Johnson, TS [1 ]
Engstrom, JL [1 ]
Gelhar, DK [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV ILLINOIS, COLL NURSING, DEPT MATERNAL CHILD NURSING, CHICAGO, IL 60612 USA
关键词
anthropometry; infant; neonate; reliability;
D O I
10.1097/00005176-199705000-00001
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The reliability of anthropometric measurements of term infants has not been studied sufficiently to determine if these measurements are reliable enough to be used in clinical practice and research. This study described the intra- and interexaminer reliability of the following anthropometric measurements: weight (WT), head circumference (HC), chest circumference (CC), abdominal circumference (AC), mid-arm circumference (MAC), and length. Methods: A convenience sample of 50 clinically stable term infants was studied. Two examiners obtained the six measurements twice using blank tape measures. The order of examiners was randomized and the examiners were masked to their own and the other examiners' measurements. Results: The intraexaminer mean absolute differences were as follows: WT = 1.88, 3.28 g; HC = 0.29, 0.29 cm; CC = 0.50, 0.78 cm; AC = 0.71, 0.77 cm; MAC = 0.36, 0.39 cm; length = 0.92, 1.18 cm. The interexaminer mean absolute differences were as follows: WT = 1.94, 1.66 g; HC = 0.37, 0.36 cm; CC = 0.59, 0.72 cm; AC = 0.99, 0.77 cm; MAC = 0.41, 0.57 cm; length = 1.57, 1.47 cm. Conclusions: These findings indicate that intraexaminer differences tended to be smaller than interexaminer differences for all measures except weight, which remained stable for intra- and interexaminer comparisons. These findings also suggest that weight and head circumference were the most reliable measures, whereas length and mid-arm circumference were the least reliable measures.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 505
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, J AM DIET ASSOC, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.jada.2006.02.009
[2]   SIMPLIFIED SCORE FOR ASSESSMENT OF FETAL MATURATION OF NEWLY BORN INFANTS [J].
BALLARD, JL ;
NOVAK, KK ;
DRIVER, M .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1979, 95 (05) :769-774
[3]  
BHALLA AK, 1993, INDIAN PEDIATR, V31, P41
[4]   RESEARCH FROM THE SOUTH - MID-ARM AND CHEST CIRCUMFERENCES AT BIRTH AS PREDICTORS OF LOW BIRTH-WEIGHT AND NEONATAL-MORTALITY IN THE COMMUNITY [J].
BHARGAVA, SK ;
RAMJI, S ;
KUMAR, A ;
MOHAN, M ;
MARWAH, J ;
SACHDEV, HPS .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1985, 291 (6509) :1617-1619
[5]   THE RELIABILITY OF NEONATAL HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE MEASUREMENT [J].
BHUSHAN, V ;
PANETH, N .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 44 (10) :1027-1035
[6]   LINEAR GROWTH IN THE EARLY NEONATAL-PERIOD [J].
BISHOP, NJ ;
KING, FJ ;
LUCAS, A .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 1990, 65 (07) :707-708
[7]  
CATALANO PM, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V79, P46
[8]   HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE ABDOMINAL CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO, PONDERAL INDEX AND FETAL MALNUTRITION - SHOULD HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE ABDOMINAL CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO BE ABANDONED [J].
COLLEY, NV ;
TREMBLE, JM ;
HENSON, GL ;
COLE, TJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1991, 98 (06) :524-527
[9]  
COPPER RL, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V81, P161
[10]   NEONATOMETER - NEW INFANT LENGTH MEASURER [J].
DAVIES, DP ;
HOLDING, RE .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1972, 47 (256) :938-940