Voting contagion: Modeling and analysis of a century of US presidential elections

被引:52
作者
Braha, Dan [1 ,2 ]
de Aguiar, Marcus A. M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] New England Complex Syst Inst, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Dartmouth, MA 02747 USA
[3] Univ Estadual Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 05期
关键词
STOCHASTIC RESONANCE; OPINION DYNAMICS; MASS-MEDIA; BEHAVIOR; DECISION; STATISTICS; DIVERSITY; REGIONS; HEALTH; SPREAD;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0177970
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Social influence plays an important role in human behavior and decisions. Sources of influence can be divided as external, which are independent of social context, or as originating from peers, such as family and friends. An important question is how to disentangle the social contagion by peers from external influences. While a variety of experimental and observational studies provided insight into this problem, identifying the extent of contagion based on large-scale observational data with an unknown network structure remains largely unexplored. By bridging the gap between the large-scale complex systems perspective of collective human dynamics and the detailed approach of social sciences, we present a parsimonious model of social influence, and apply it to a central topic in political science-elections and voting behavior. We provide an analytical expression of the county vote-share distribution, which is in excellent agreement with almost a century of observed U.S. presidential election data. Analyzing the social influence topography over this period reveals an abrupt phase transition from low to high levels of social contagion, and robust differences among regions. These results suggest that social contagion effects are becoming more instrumental in shaping large-scale collective political behavior, with implications on democratic electoral processes and policies.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [21] Tactical Voting in Plurality Elections
    Araujo, Nuno A. M.
    Andrade, Jose S., Jr.
    Herrmann, Hans J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (09): : 1 - 5
  • [22] Armoudian M., 2010, The Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior, P300
  • [23] The social calculus of voting: Interpersonal, media, and organizational influences on presidential choices
    Beck, PA
    Dalton, RJ
    Greene, S
    Huckfeldt, R
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2002, 96 (01) : 57 - 73
  • [24] Berelson B. R., 1954, Voting
  • [25] Election results and the Sznajd model on Barabasi network
    Bernardes, AT
    Stauffer, D
    Kertész, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, 2002, 25 (01) : 123 - 127
  • [26] A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization
    Bond, Robert M.
    Fariss, Christopher J.
    Jones, Jason J.
    Kramer, Adamd. I.
    Marlow, Cameron
    Settle, Jaime E.
    Fowler, James H.
    [J]. NATURE, 2012, 489 (7415) : 295 - 298
  • [27] Spatial correlations in vote statistics: a diffusive field model for decision-making
    Borghesi, C.
    Bouchaud, J-P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, 2010, 75 (03) : 395 - 404
  • [28] Election Turnout Statistics in Many Countries: Similarities, Differences, and a Diffusive Field Model for Decision-Making
    Borghesi, Christian
    Raynal, Jean-Claude
    Bouchaud, Jean-Philippe
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (05):
  • [29] Global Civil Unrest: Contagion, Self-Organization, and Prediction
    Braha, Dan
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (10):
  • [30] How to make an efficient propaganda
    Carletti, T
    Fanelli, D
    Grolli, S
    Guarino, A
    [J]. EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, 2006, 74 (02): : 222 - 228